Yea but I think I prefer OS. Is there a big difference between them?
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
My switch is unpatched so I'm good. Is there a big difference between Atmosphere and OS?
OS stands for operating system, so nobody knows for sure what you're talking about. Do you mean SX OS? I don't recommend using SX OS for various reasons, but if you have to use it, then you need to wait for them to release 8.0.0 support.
I mean... https://gbatemp.net/threads/nereba-exploit-reboot-to-fusee-gelee-payload-from-stock-firmware.536409/
You can already run fusee on patched switches.
Not yet anyways. Nereba only supports firmware 1.0 at the moment and patched units ship with at least firmware 4.1
Ahh good point. Should support 7.1 down the line though. Just wanted to drop some good news.Not yet anyways. Nereba only supports firmware 1.0 at the moment and patched units ship with at least firmware 4.1
Oh riiight in the context you're correct sorry, but for those who are below 8.0, consider!!
Here you are again. Talking no senses as always. We already know that you dont like SX OS, so stop trying to convience people who use SX OS as their CFW and try to help for once.
None CFW is betther than other CFW. Me for example use SX OS because is the easier to use. Just plug and play and because they have XCI loading and emunand (It means you can play all your original and online games without worry to get banned on your sysnand and all your CFW stuffs on your emunand.) That atmosphere dont have right now and probably never (Maybe emunand Yes, but who knows).
If you already update to 8.0.0 just wait until TX Team update
Last edited by jajamundo,
I did help, and I didn't respond to the second post because I didn't want to derail the thread. Take a chill pill.
Atmo works better with homebrew and sxos has xci loading that lets u play backups without bans
Just buy a second switch and dedicate it to hacking and you your legit switch for when you want online games and want to support the developers. I have 3 switches. Worth it.
You can use it on 7.x by bypassing the firmware check with Goldleaf or Tinfoil:
Titleinfo:
- Name: Super Smash Bros. Ultimate
- Editor: Nintendo
- Build number: 3.0.1
- Supported Languages: US (eng), UK (eng), JP, FR, DE, LAT (spa), SPA, IT, DU, CAD (fr), RU, KOR, TAI, CH
- Content type: Update
- Version: 524288 -> Patch (8)
Required Firmware:
- RequiredSystemVersion: 536870912 -> (8.0.0)
- Encryption (keygeneration): 7 -> (6.2.0)
- Patchable to: 404750336 -> (6.2.0)
I use XCI on usb hdd on SX OS. Does your method work with that?
Goldleaf =? https://github.com/XorTroll/Goldleaf/releases
Tinfoil =? https://github.com/digableinc/tinfoil/releases
Are these the correct links to most up to date versions of homebrew?
Similar threads
- Question
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
Jayro:
Eventhough the New 3DS XL is more powerful, I still feel like the DS Lite was a more polished system. It's a real shame that it never got an XL variant keeping the GBA slot. You'd have to go on AliExpress and buy an ML shell to give a DS phat the unofficial "DS Lite" treatment, and that's the best we'll ever get I'm afraid.+1 -
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Jayro, I don't see whats so special about the DS ML, its just a DS lite in a phat shell. At least the phat model had louder speakers, whereas the lite has a much better screen.+1 -
@
SylverReZ:
They probably said "Hey, why not we combine the two together and make a 'new' DS to sell".
-
-
-
@
Veho:
Nothing special about it other than it's more comfortable than the Lite+1
for people with beefy hands. -
-
-
-
