Hacking [How To] Remove the 022-2812 ban error with a CFW

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Deleted-19228

Guest
Because an RNG would be dumb. Nintendo has a database of all possible device IDs, and this is checked when connecting. This, and hundreds of people using the same ID, is why everyone using the "1234" patch got banned pretty fast, and Nintendo soon patched that workaround. What needs to be done is public knowledge, though. I and a few others have completely unbanned ourselves with information available on 3dbrew and with a couple, slight modifications to Luma. The only downside is that you do have to have a sacrificial system, and you lose everything tied to your old NNID. There's no way around this, and using public IDs is only going to get you banned again.

That was patched? News to me. Got a link on when/where they fixed it?
 

Joom

 ❤❤❤
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
6,141
Trophies
1
Location
US
Website
mogbox.net
XP
6,133
Country
United States
That was patched? News to me. Got a link on when/where they fixed it?
Not specifically, but the ID "1234" has been banned, so when using @Nanquitas's fork of Luma a user is faced with a new error code. Ultimately, the pull request he made is probably what tipped Nintendo off, but we'll never know.
 

Andarer

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Nov 4, 2016
Messages
20
Trophies
0
Age
34
XP
71
Country
So how exactly are people getting banned in the first place? I thought playing online with A9LH+Luma is safe = you can't get banned, because there's no way for Nintendo to tell that your console is hacked?

I just got my A9LH+Luma and now I'm worried I'll get banned for using online services like Pokebank or playing MHGen online <.<
We got banned for being stupid and playing online before release date (in my case I just forgot to switch conectivity off one time and I checked some of the features without noticing they were online).

Sacrificing a system or mirroring a system is a must to get unbanned, that's why some of us are hoping we can sacrifice a Wii because we don't have spare consoles.

Btw, if I'm not wrong, it's been 15 days already since the banwave, right? So we can asume it's permanent.
 
Last edited by Andarer,

Deleted member 355359

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Messages
392
Trophies
0
XP
334
Country
Mongolia
That was patched? News to me. Got a link on when/where they fixed it?
Not specifically, but the ID "1234" has been banned, so when using @Nanquitas's fork of Luma a user is faced with a new error code. Ultimately, the pull request he made is probably what tipped Nintendo off, but we'll never know.
November 16th is when account.nintendo.net REQUIRED X-Nintendo-Device-Cert, but it didn't matter, literally anything worked for it. It was just required as an http header whereas it wasn't before (perhaps they just disabled the requirement for a while and just brought it back now? Talking if they had this sorted in something like 2013 but removed it in 2015 or something like that).
And then, November 21th is when account.nintendo.net started refusing invalid Device-Certs and returned "Unauthorized device" if an account was attempted to be created with a mismatching DeviceID/Device-Cert combo.

My theory is that they had implemented this at the beginning of the server software's creation but had either disabled it or forgot to enable it. It either took a while to initialize, or something else. If this was implemented just now, then what the fuck is wrong with Nintendo's network department?

Additionally, Nintendo banned a lot of DeviceIDs, along with 1234 and all the IDs created on it.
Either DeviceID bans take time to apply, or they are just in clusters. I had an experience once where my 2DS was banned from account.nintendo.net, but not nasc.nintendowifi.net. This might or might not matter, it was banned on the game servers the next morning.

Another thing is that @PF2M's Wii was banned after just one account that did nothing wrong, but we are using forms that fake the system version, disregards the CTR/CAFE NEX account, etc. So they might just be in clusters. Does this mean it's their decision, or do they issue DeviceID bans to higher-level admins, or..??

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Sacrificing a system or mirroring a system is a must to get unbanned, that's why some of us are hoping we can sacrifice a Wii because we don't have spare consoles.
This is why I hope I can get this working in some way. Most people have Wiis, and the people who care about the Wii Shop Channel either aren't going to be banned in the first place or have Wii Us, so this is a good way to go, though I'm lacking encouragement and I can't access my own Wii myself.
 

Joom

 ❤❤❤
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
6,141
Trophies
1
Location
US
Website
mogbox.net
XP
6,133
Country
United States
Aye, what I meant was that I don't know if anyone is working on it or the idea was scrapped.
The only people that have ARM9 binaries that can load these things into the ITCM don't have a Wii at their disposal for testing. You'll have to wait for someone to release an ITCM injector.
 

Txustra

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
May 18, 2013
Messages
458
Trophies
1
Age
33
XP
2,129
Country
Spain

Deleted member 355359

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Messages
392
Trophies
0
XP
334
Country
Mongolia
I dumped my NAND.bin with bootmii but there is no device.cert after doing the Dolphin emu process. There is a cert.sys tho.
How do I extract my device.cert?
Since the file was in my NAND, I thought it was there for everyone else's, but the device.cert was dumped for myself using some homebrew that I used.
Anyway, you could dump it using the first tutorial I linked, which WILL actually dump your device.cert.
 

Joom

 ❤❤❤
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
6,141
Trophies
1
Location
US
Website
mogbox.net
XP
6,133
Country
United States
I dumped my NAND.bin with bootmii but there is no device.cert after doing the Dolphin emu process. There is a cert.sys tho.
How do I extract my device.cert?
These things are useless to you unless you have a way of injecting them into the ITCM of a banned 3DS.
 

DoArt

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Messages
46
Trophies
0
Age
32
XP
103
Country
United States
So I heard you should not use this as no one knows the repercussions or what ever but how unsafe would it be to use this once just to make a new nnid and never use it again? This does allow you to unlink nnid and make a new one on a banned console(unbanned by using another lfcb), correct?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Nuh uh
  • DragonMals @ DragonMals:
    An underrated opinion: While Bluesky as a platform is better than Twitter, Bluesky's userbase won't be better than Twitter as people are saying because everyone from the non-bootleg site are moving to the bootleg one expecting for themselves to change with their attitude, but that never works like that.
  • DragonMals @ DragonMals:
    I will say though: Bluesky as a micro-blogging site? Needs a bit more oomph and I would officially like it better than Twiter. Can't even post gifs on that site, like what the fuck?
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Diarrhea is toxic
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Can you post milfs though?
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Gilfs
    +3
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    Kilfs. (Ken knows)
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Gay
    +1
  • NinStar @ NinStar:
    fake and gay
    +1
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    Fake news is hot
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    hey guyz
    +2
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    @realtimesave, I'm here. Why?
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    Have you found anywhere else to sell your Switch OLED?
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    Ello :)
    +1
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @DragonMals, Yeah one is gonna have the same attitude in any site no matter what
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    @SylverReZ, how are you?
  • SylverReZ @ SylverReZ:
    I'm okay.
    +1
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    I'll buy it, full price, meet me in the dark alley behind that closed blockbuster.
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    You'll get the money and he'll say keep the switch
  • BigOnYa @ BigOnYa:
    You'll get more than just the money
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    @SylverReZ nah I still have it listed but it seems nobody is serious about buying
    +1
  • realtimesave @ realtimesave:
    @SylverReZ I bought the 2TB nvme for my lenovo go. thinking about putting its 512 into a usb stick enclosure. because its 512 is only worth 20$ so it isn't worth my time or patience to try to sell it
    +1
    realtimesave @ realtimesave: @SylverReZ I bought the 2TB nvme for my lenovo go. thinking about putting its 512 into a usb... +1