DiscostewSM said:
QUOTE said:
Nintendo requires its suppliers...
He called him a dumbass because he's making the assumption (to assume makes an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me') that just because conflict materials "could" be used by Nintendo, he thinks they are. Even with an auto-reply email, they clearly state that they "require" their suppliers to comply with CSR Procurement Guidelines, not "hope" they comply. If they don't comply, they don't do business with them. Simple as that. If the supplier says they are, but are secretly not, then the supplier is to blame, not Nintendo. Same goes with any other company in this predicament who go by the same guidelines. If it is found out that the supplier was not following the guidelines, Nintendo (and other companies) will surely close their accounts with them. But, what about all the components they now carry that has the stain on them?
Throwing them away post-sale because they are stained with conflict material does nothing for the actual problem from the source, so they use what they have. If you found out your product contained material that came from the death of people
after you purchased and received such material, would throwing it away help the situation? If anything, throwing it away would show your ungratefulness for the suffering the people went through that worked to get it to you. This "news" of Nintendo possibly using conflict material in the 3DS is only recent, while the 3DS has been in production for months.
There are several documentaries that contradict your assumptions:
Wal-Mart :The High Cost of Low Prices
Blood Diamonds - Sierra Leone
There are many others, but they are not as widely available.
Corporations will indeed make business with (unethical) entities to make profits.
[Of course they will. I only pointed out that Nintendo says that they do not conduct business with those that are not up to the guidelines they set. To lie openly doesn't hold up in court, so why lie?]
On your second point, you assume the conflict and exploitation has stopped
[I never said that. I said that their business with the supplier would stop], when in fact it hasn’t. You assume Nintendo is not making more consoles and it is not going to make more consoles in the future
[As I never assumed that, that would be your assumption. They will continue to make consoles, but not with components from an nonconforming supplier]. I guarantee you, the amount of consoles Nintendo sells will determine how much more consoles the company will produce.
Ungratefulness? The suffering people are still suffering massive genocides fuelled by the sale of these materials.
[They will still suffer if the materials keep selling. I'm talking about materials that have already been sold, not materials that could still be sold. They can stop buying after the fact, but suggesting to throw away the materials they have already in their possession (because they most likely can't get refunds) is why I brought up the comment of ungratefulness to those that suffered.]
@Fireballo You are f---ing lucky you live in the dominant majority. That is a highly racist comment.
Edit: @Fireballo's reply.