So you say you were gonna ignore it, and here you are, back again.if it make's you feel anybetter "I'M wrong"
And pretending that you're a "big boy" isn't exactly cool.
So you say you were gonna ignore it, and here you are, back again.if it make's you feel anybetter "I'M wrong"
CONSPIRACIES ;O;You know what makes this post really funny, the post number
View attachment 1499
Could you say, the brick is off the wall?Something's still off here though, nonetheless.
i'm 37
So does Microsoft or Dell have the right to remotely brick your PC for using torrents?from what I can see,
CAN they brick your 3DS if they find you using it with unauthorized code... Yes
ARE they allowed to install updates on your 3DS without your consent... Yes (as per the licence agreement)
COULD they reep more profits from bricking, debatable.
WOULD they brick a 3DS, Doubt it. They may do a Microsoft (Lifetime ban of the unit online) but killing the whole unit na, not even Sony or Microsoft have had the brass balls to kill the whole machine.
Check your settings. Just like Windows will want to turn automatic updates on by default for safety reasons, Nintendo wants them on by default as well.When I connect to my wifi connection the other day the 3ds ask me if I want to test the connection I did, then it start downloading the lastest update? without user input. I thought nintendo were not allow to force updates on people?
Check your settings. Just like Windows will want to turn automatic updates on by default for safety reasons, Nintendo wants them on by default as well.
That said, even though the 3DS will download the update, you can always say "no" to not apply it (unless the 3DS is set to do it automatically as well).
Could you say, the brick is off the wall?
;o;
So does Microsoft or Dell have the right to remotely brick your PC for using torrents?
I don't know why people think video game systems are special. They're computers too, they just with a locked OS.
An EULA is not above the law. An agreement to do something illegal is not a legal agreement.Actually if ya read the ELUA's they have more power than people think, they have the ability too and in the ELUA most people blindly agree too they state they can do it if they want, I.E. MS actually in the ELUA stated they can remove software from your computer if they want too.
its not that im saying they will do anything in fact I highly doubt it, however the ELUA which is a legal agreement (flimsy one at that mind you) that people agree too gives them more power than people think.
An EULA is not above the law. An agreement to do something illegal is not a legal agreement.
http://www.nintendo.com/consumer/info/en_na/docs.jsp
Nintendo 3DS/Nintendo 3DS XL -> System User Agreements (EULA)
Notice that they point out that the EULA can be changed at any time without prior notice. This goes along with the EULA being a "cover my ass" document. Things like "we may stop 3DS online services at any time" seem "duh" to the average user, but Nintendo feels the need to point them out just in case somebody tries to sue claiming they weren't aware of it, the EULA makes them aware of it.
Also read the second post in this thread for examples of things that Nintendo likes to claim in EULAs (that the Wii might update automatically without your consent, that the 3DS will stop working if you use any unauthorized third-party hardware in it) that just don't happen, because Nintendo's not stupid enough to actually try it. It's there just in case some shit goes wrong.
And before any mention of Microsoft or Sony's consoles, they just ban from online, which is a service (not a good) they run with their money and servers, and they have full right (legal and moral) to ban anybody at any time they want.
Which I was trying to get at earlierTranslates to: Nintendo don't have the balls.
You mean region lockouts? Well for handhelds its odd but in home consoles its the normal so not that badbut bricking for having a korean cryptographic key in addition to the eur/us/jap ones is somehow different?
because they got away with that