Go hopefully descriptive titles.
Start with a quote, who it might be attributed to is debated ( https://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/04/06/fish-climb/ ) but serves here.
"Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid."
Others might ponder the equally debated types of intelligence. https://www.analyticssteps.com/blogs/9-types-intelligence
Anyway most people find a skill that despite willingness (and preferably some effort) that they are not good at, or despite serious efforts barely rank as mediocre. If you are good you will find workarounds if it is essential or just not let it bother you, others will stew on things for many years or, worse still, allow others to judge them by it (see also the generations of "could have gone pro but for" sports thing).
In my case. Music. The ability to read some sheet music and strum something out on the guitar or piano or whatever I think would be nice to have. Tried for a very long time and it is not something I have any real aptitude for, and my rhythm is even worse/basically nonexistent. Maths, abstraction, my knife skills and find handwork skills are great... music playing ability does not however seem to flow from that, music theory makes more sense but that is theory in the same way you can predict the actions of the stock market (there are rules of thumb but go in too hard with such things and you will lose).
Some people reckon they can't draw. Sometimes I wonder if this is a lack of technique being taught -- all the techniques I learned for engineering drawing helped massively with a lot of others where you might be tempted to let your hand and basic mental heuristics try to guide you (find suitable reference points, set those, fill in the rest doing wonders for most people).
What is your skill you would like to have but biology say no and you still admire?
Start with a quote, who it might be attributed to is debated ( https://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/04/06/fish-climb/ ) but serves here.
"Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid."
Others might ponder the equally debated types of intelligence. https://www.analyticssteps.com/blogs/9-types-intelligence
Anyway most people find a skill that despite willingness (and preferably some effort) that they are not good at, or despite serious efforts barely rank as mediocre. If you are good you will find workarounds if it is essential or just not let it bother you, others will stew on things for many years or, worse still, allow others to judge them by it (see also the generations of "could have gone pro but for" sports thing).
In my case. Music. The ability to read some sheet music and strum something out on the guitar or piano or whatever I think would be nice to have. Tried for a very long time and it is not something I have any real aptitude for, and my rhythm is even worse/basically nonexistent. Maths, abstraction, my knife skills and find handwork skills are great... music playing ability does not however seem to flow from that, music theory makes more sense but that is theory in the same way you can predict the actions of the stock market (there are rules of thumb but go in too hard with such things and you will lose).
Some people reckon they can't draw. Sometimes I wonder if this is a lack of technique being taught -- all the techniques I learned for engineering drawing helped massively with a lot of others where you might be tempted to let your hand and basic mental heuristics try to guide you (find suitable reference points, set those, fill in the rest doing wonders for most people).
What is your skill you would like to have but biology say no and you still admire?