I was heavily involved in reading about and watching the debate/trail in Congress. I painfully watched the testimony. There's nothing you can say or show me to convince me Trump was guilty of quid pro quo and even if he was I wouldn't care. When I negotiate with someone over a trade, like swapping a phone for whatever I always want something in return. I just don't go around giving people free phones that I paid for.
Yes, I'll take the word of the two President's involved in the phone call over bits and pieces of the conversation thrown together to paint a picture of something that never happened. The context and the rest of what said is important. Sure, you can pick out a couple things someone said out of pages of material and tie them together to form something they never said, but that's fabrication ... nothing more than made up lies.
I'm sorry, but I'm not going to read your links or sources, there's nothing new to be learned. I mean, when the Democrats main witness claims he doesn't have access to his records so he has to assume most of what he says and then after the fact you learn he had access to those records you'll see how thin and lousy a case the Democrats had against Trump.
There's nothing wrong with Trump renegotiation a trade deal or wanting something in return in a trade deal. That's sort of how a trade deal works, you give something and get something.