Most things, no. We don't know what any of the overworld content or story will look like in this game, and I wouldn't want to assume what form they might take. That's completely different from comparing screenshots of Let's Go to screenshots of upscaled Citra and noting the only difference is native higher-res textures.
It'll be fine. 3DS was super weak, especially considering Switch is a portable more powerful than Wii U.
No, it's not about the models solely. Environment textures, basic game structure, animations, and more, it's all clearly identical. Perhaps more importantly: what real differences between Let's Go and US/UM do you see that I'm not seeing? Other than GO catching, anyway, because that's an easy edit to battle scenes.
Well, I said identical, but whatever floats your boat. It's the best assumption to make for the sake of discussion, even if it turns out incorrect later. And I'd lick a Switch cart if that happens. Look at Fallout 3 and Fallout New Vegas side by side. Just as obviously the same engine as Let's Go and US/UM are.
Again, sake of discussion. All you're doing is stonewalling, and on a point the vast majority of this thread would agree on.
Well it's clear you haven't been interested in actual discussion of anything for the last page, so I don't think it matters much.
I never cited it as fact, only you did. I made it clear it was an assumption for the sake of discussion. So I was using an assumption as an assumption in a discussion. We good?
The whole thing that started this was when you said "If it was a different engine, maybe. Since it's the 3DS engine...," you were stating that these games were using the 3ds engines as a fact when their usage is just an assumption.I never cited it as fact, only you did. I made it clear it was an assumption for the sake of discussion. So I was using an assumption as an assumption in a discussion. We good?
Tip: whenever someone is writing informally, such as on the internet, it's from their point of view, their opinions, and their assumptions. I didn't state "Since it's a fact that it's on the 3DS engine..." so it should be assumed (lol) that I'm speaking for my opinion. The same opinion many in this thread share, but whatever, irrelevant I suppose. You're the one who started throwing around the word 'fact' initially.
Dang man you cray. Definitely gonna pre-order Let's Go Eevee soon though, now that it's up on Amazon.
Good possible that it's just a port of the engine, but to be fair there're slight improvments. Just e.g. compare the shadows the characters cast in the 3DS version and in the Let's Go [insert starter]. There seems to be a general improvment in the lighting system (not only the shadows), but that dosn't means it isn't a (improved) port just to be clear.
I do think the dancing and stones were a bit too much. The extra move should have just been an extra slot that you learn either externally or simply by leveling up. They should have probably expanded the 4 attacks to 6 attacks already, anyway. Not something that not only takes up a holding slot, but also makes you sit through a unskippable dancing animation every time. It really slows down the battles. They should have just stuck with the temporary transformations. While I'm bit more OK with this taking up a slot, this didn't really need to take up a holding slot either.
Xdqwerty
@
SylverReZ:
