mhhh... 'new' (and obsolete) zxr didn't even work as advertised (manual supposed to work).
Because you are an arse that doesn't mean everybody else should be one.
MasQChips is simply a better person just for sharing.....
It was never advertised because it was leaked before it was ready and that version was never going to be the release version.
However you are correct about me being an arse and because I am an arse I am going to release a final version, without source, as I never save the source being pure lazy, screw the gpl. Like anyone can do anything about it anyway without resources. At least nobody could say I didn't share the goods.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
So making a modification without source means that making and keeping it open to anyone who wants to see it is wrong? I fail to see the point. Just because you modified a binary doesn't give you the right to completely dismiss a license, even if you consider it a "ball ache". Keeping the source open lets everyone see or make modification to the source, so they're not restricted to hacking it apart.
I don't share the source as I dont keep or have any, everything I do is pretty much done on the fly and all stored in the noggin. I'm much to lazy to write up anything after the fact, especially when I'm working for fun and for free. Sorry but that's just how I do shat. I am more than willing to help any dev out with my methods or re-creating any mods and they can do as they please with source.
Also just to make it clear again, I didn't use or look at the source to start with and had no issue hacking it apart as you say, infact I find it easier and quicker to work like this rather than reading through lines of dreary code and becoming suicidal. It's nothing personal about the source and if I had any I would share it.
What would you guys really prefer.
A) I release a modified version without source.
Or
B) I don't let anyone else have it because I can't be bothered to document it.