I can only repeat myself: Pirates get, what pirates deserve...
Ah well - not the original Neimod - shame - this thread was a riot while it lasted
I can only repeat myself: Pirates get, what pirates deserve...
I can only repeat myself: Pirates get, what pirates deserve...
I can only repeat myself: Pirates get, what pirates deserve...
To peole asking for assembly code 1. I personally don't care about your personal beliefs
2. I don't have IDA on my phone and I am not currently on my computer.
3. Why don't YOU take a good look at the decrypted gateway payloads ?
Just saying...it's not like a lot of developers haven't confirmed it already...
Yeah I looked - couldn't find anything - but I've missed stuff like this before in IDA - heck - if I found it myself I'd be claiming the glory and posting now!
That's why I await one of you geniuses to post the address offsets for me
I'm assuming you started with a diff against a supposedly clean version?
I can only repeat myself: Pirates get, what pirates deserve...
I'm assuming you started with a diff against a supposedly clean version?
As far as I know, Normmatt patched the initial checksum routine, not the eMMC corruption code, therefore you won't just find it through differential analysis.
/me yawns....Yeah - or via a what a load of bollocks analysis
er - I did a checksum - why would I do a diff too?
As far as I know, Normmatt patched the initial checksum routine, not the eMMC corruption code, therefore you won't just find it through differential analysis.
Another lying thread? But if its true I think GW team doing the right thing, Why should clones steel GW's hard work....
/me yawns....
Just saying...it's not like a lot of developers haven't confirmed it already...
Nah that's actually from the pseudo code (the function name) you can't actually get the real name for it, even though it does brick your console in the end xDIt's calling a goddamn brick() function. That's proof enough.
It's calling a goddamn brick() function. That's proof enough.