D
Deleted User
Guest
I remember saying the person who reviewed it was trash, not game informer.lol well cmon if the games is no good is not good that why Sonic generations got like a 6.5
I just remember people saying Game Informer was trash and terrible when they gave it a 6.5 (even though Eurogamer gave it a 7 and the average is around 76% for the game) and even wrote them off as "worse than IGN". Now they're giving a widely anticipated game a 10/10 and I'm sure people will be repainting the hate train to become the praise train.
I have nothing againts GI as a whole, but that one reviewer in particular is horrible.
I'm one of the few people that doesn't judge the company as a whole, but rather the individual, I myself understand that reviews are done by different people in the company, and if that wasnt the case, then there shouldn't be reviews in the first.place.
Sonic Generations is not a 6.5 game, its not a broken game, and while its short, plays a lot better than games like call of duty.