Here's how things are here:
- If your code works: You used AI.
- If your code doesn't work: You used AI.
- If you learn fast: You used AI.
- If "you don't know what you're doing": It's because you used AI.
- If you study open source: It's because you using AI.
- If you stay closed source: You used AI.
- Don't go open source: To not feed AI.
Sigh. The groups. In my opinion a clear case of good idea... that doesn't work.
It leads to fragmentation. Groups die fairly quickly because of missing activity.
You could try nevertheless. Maybe you get lucky and get an active group.
And the groups feature is an additional pseudo-argument for dismissing any suggestions regarding new sections (in addition to the rhetorical question if there are already enough threads on the suggeted topic to justify a dedicated section - as if a new section could never spark interest)