The phrase "artistic merit" goes against the concept of art as a whole. Art is just people expressing themselves and making somethings out of nothings with no real fixed solid goal.
But the player didn't create the game. The artist was the developers and the game was their art.
You made the end goal for yourself.
People can't decide if you met standards when you made your own standards.
Abstract art... what the heck happened there?
Anyways
The point is that you have no one to impress. You're doing the art for yourself.
The player has no end goal. They're there to observe. They did nothing to contribute. That's like going to an art museum and painting on paintings that were hanging there
"People act entitled and talk about how one's art doesn't do everything that's perfect to that specific person." yes because just because art wasn't made for you specifically, doesn't mean you can't have prefences
"The player has no end goal. They're there to observe. They did nothing to contribute. That's like going to an art museum and painting on paintings that were hanging there" yes but im talking about the devs