Who's the one making the argument based on bad logic? You prove the Switch 2 is hackable by hacking it. Proving that the Switch 2 is impossible to hack, however, would probably earn you a Nobel Prize.
Flaw in logic, not hacked is not the same as unhackable. Unless you are in MCU you can't go the the alternate universe where the Nvidia bug was not there. After you found one that it didn't get hacked you sill have no proof that it is unhackable.
I actually don't really give a shit if it's hacked or not so it's not cope.
Sure, it's as close to proof as we can get, but not 100% proof. It's like a limit. You can get extremely close as you approach infinity, but you never quite hit it do...
Even if it takes a thousand years it would still not be impossible. You can't argue for impossibility. Just say chances are not high and more people can accept it. I know some people in this thread probably won't. I would.
Possible, I would say something bigger is also possible, it is also possible that they didn't.
There is another possible. You don't need to pay me for your not able to proof that it is impossible.
You excuse for not trying is roundly rejected...
This game is unity, what you need to do is to find the function name of the old one that works, then look for the same function name in the new version. Study the old logic and if the new logic is different you have to figure it out. Should be...
You are not getting one cent to claim that something is possible and you have nothing to show about the impossibility
If I said you may be the CEO of Nintendo, for that I would get 10 bucks if it were true cause that can be proven to be wrong...
Why so many people are obsessed with new is a strange human condition. Wanting better is well and good. New is rather foolish. That is how you can get Aladdin's magic lamp, by trading a new lamp for the old magical one
If a person can get a cent...