http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/pnppw...XPrem-devs.mspx
Did you even bothered reading the date that article was posted ? December 2001.
Honestly, how can you take stuff seriously when it's nearly 5 years old ? ESPECIALLY stuff from Microsoft.
That's also stuff concerning Windows XP Beta 2 and unless you're a computer degenerate or something of the sort, you'll notice that Windows XP has reached a state that most people would call complete (Even though Microsoft has the nasty habit of making it's customers pay for Beta Testing, since this really is what retail versions of Windows are, although they are alot more complete then the official Beta versions.)
And honestly, Of all the Plug and Play devices that i use and that my friends uses, i haven't seen or heard about any data corruptions happening this way. Let's just face it, Suprise Removal is not dangerous, it's the same thing that has people go paranoid with firewalls and antivirus.
The ONLY dangerous thing with Surprise Removal is if you're stupid enough to yank your device out while data is being transferred.
Most people that have problems with it are just using it like a monkey would use a buttplug... It's simple, learn to use your stuff with care, not paranoia. >_>
Dunno if that's the case with G6s though, being made of what Microsoft and probably anyone in the market would call of "Illegal construct", i'm not really surprised it causes issues to the already trauma-inducing Windows.
Heh, what next ? Having a minor scratch on your CDs make them non-functional ? Yeah.... I'll be over there rolling myself on the floor and dying of laughter.
I was gonna take your post seriously... but this rests my case: "Windows XP has reached a state that most people would call complete"
Just the simple fact that we still have the huge hole of Internet Explorer still wide open... since when was it a problem? Oh yea, over 5 years ago. So... in choosing between the big hole in IE and this Surprise removal... I wonder which is more important for MS to patch up... Seeing that IE isn't fixed, I can only assume MS went for this trivial issue.
Oh, and I musta been talkin' to a dead person due to laughter.... cuz my cd was unreadable due to scratch. ouch... I wonder if the scratch occured over the TOC section.... cuz I'm a noob and I dunno which section of the disc is TOC and if it would renders the disc useless....
EDIT: Lets just say you are correct and that MS fixed this problem that many finds very annoying. I'm sure there are documentations on the matter somewhere. Otherwise the latest documentation stands current. Also, I did say that major companies have taken actions and things work flawlessly (sandisk was the example).