Besides your Right to Protect and Defend yourself?????? Wow, let me make that List........going to be a little while.....What rights are the left pushing to remove?
Besides your Right to Protect and Defend yourself?????? Wow, let me make that List........going to be a little while.....What rights are the left pushing to remove?
Sure, prove your first claim and get that list together.Besides your Right to Protect and Defend yourself?????? Wow, let me make that List........going to be a little while.....
If Texas wants to secede, I propose building a wall around Austin first.Texas wants to secede?
So, just another regular Tuesday over here, then.
Removal of your 2nd Amendment Rights.Sure, prove your first claim and get that list together.
I can drive for 12 hours and not leaving my neighbourhood, though I'd get sick of driving around the block.Did you know you could drive for 12 hours and still be in Texas? That's how grand and great it is.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but I could care less about Trump, his Trumpetts, or BidenI knew it'd be second amendment nonsense. We just want common sense regulations which the ammosexuals melt down over.
Which by the way, that wasn't a source but an unhinged MAGA Meltdown
Whatever you say, ammosexual.Sorry to burst your bubble, but I could care less about Trump, his Trumpetts, or Biden
I can't believe people that seen this or actually lived through this, and think this should be a model for a state, let alone a whole country.They don't even have the infrastructure to handle snowstorms and hurricanes without the federal government. Texas would be a 3rd world country at the get go.
This is always the (weak sauce) argument I hear in response to a gun rights proponent - the (thinly veiled) suggestion that it’s some kind of sexual attraction to guns/a coping mechanism for erotic inadequacy. I’m not even American and I don’t understand that - there’s no reason why the state should regulate what weapons I can or can’t own or for what purpose, the government is not my dad. Any infringement in that regard is no different than treating the citizen as pre-emptively guilty of some kind of imaginary gun crime.Whatever you say, ammosexual.
DC is ineligible for statehood because it’s the seat of government. If anything, DC should cede excess land back to the states it came from, whether they want it back or not. It’s already too big as it is - it’s not supposed to exceed 10 square miles. Puerto Rico is far closer to becoming a state than DC ever should be. Unfortunately, every proposal I’ve seen to date is nothing more than an attempt to generate electors out of thin air.We could (should actually) grant DC and Puerto Rico statehood.
Oh please, that is the weakest of sauce. Besides, I don’t necessarily see that as a drawback. The constitution exists to protect citizens from government tyranny, both the second amendment and the non-statehood of DC are an integral part of that purpose.The response was to mock the dead horse "they gon take muh gunz" argument which has long been debunked.
The events of 1/6 are why DC actually needs statehood. They were powerless to call on any military for defense when those losers sacked the capitol.
They'd have to return any and all federal property, so all military bases would have to be combed through and US property confiscated because Texas wouldn't be entitled to it. I'd imagine any military bases would also be demolished in this hypothetical.question is does Texas have any of OUR nuclear stockpile? US: sure you can secede but give us back our nukes