If it's usually 12 weeks old, then stop advocating for 9 month abortions.
Not you personally. The left in general.
Straw man number1 and unlogical argument, since you made an accusation towards me
Choice for what? Killing babies? Guess what? I can't kill babies either.
You asserted it was to kill babies as your original argument. So your later positions are incoherent with your original reasoning. Since you question me saying that people deserve a choice. aka focused directly on me.
Well golly, let's just allow kindergartners to look at porn in their school libraries. That's not gr00m1ng at all.
Straw man number 2, since it's not porn.
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/...na-and-trinity-neal-illustrated-by-art-twink/
https://books.google.com/books/about/Téo_s_Tutu.html?id=zAdAEAAAQBAJ&source=kp_book_description
just a sample of some of the books being banned. All specifically towards trans individuals or queer.
The only people who paint El Salvadordans is you since I had to provide the distinction.
Strawman 3 and dodging the argument.
Strawman due to the fact that I never said they looked alike. And I had to provide a distinction, since your own party refuses to acknowledge that there is a distinction, via "the illegals" and boiling it down all to that/dehumanizing.
If we said "el salvador immigrants" people would be a lot more aware of the gang conflict that is happening there (since a large bulk of the illegal immigrants are as a result of that conflict. And waiting down at the border is not a good idea, when the gang will actively hunt you down and shoot you.)
But your party would rather deflect, and boil it down to "illegals" and bash on them. Not like your party also made it way harder to get refugee status... oh wait. They did. (and if I'm not mistakened biden hasn't fixed that. So he get's a layer of shit as well.)
And you dodged an argument. Earlier "on Trader brain hemorrhages"
This is a dodged argument after I countered your assertion, and now your dropping it.
Really entertaining how you want to throw everything at the wall at me.
I guarantee that you have always been against building the wall and you are perfectly ok with 6 million illegal aliens in 18 months because "we made the problem".
Building a wall is ineffective. I'm not even talking from a political stand point. I'm just talking basic ass maintenance and up keep cost, topped with the fact people WILL find ways around that wall. In some places (in the world) if there was some sort of choke point then yes a wall is feasible.
But for the US, no we can't, primarily because the amount of distance that would have to be covered, ontop of the geological area not being exactly well suited for building without proper treatment. Otherwise you get the current wall now, which is toppling over itself. The foundation is not stable.
I propose a better solution. Fix the problem we made. It's like drinking soda after every meal, and trying to lose weight. So instead you drink a fuck ton of water so you piss the soda out in hoping that it helps loose weight.
Why not just remove the soda? Putting a wall up doesn't fix the problem, it just makes it easier to ignore the problem.
So you are saying that the entire country decided all at once to completely flip, even though less than a handful of national politicians actually changed parties.
"All at once"
Wow. no go on ahead, just skip the fact that it took roughly 24 years for that flip to happen, and it didn't even happen evenly. But okay sure. Whatever.
? If the parties truly flipped, why were there still segregationists in the Democrat Party into the 80's?
Because it didn't happen all at once? Granted you clearly skipped that reading or at least comprehension and went straight to responding.
The map shows that it didn't happen all at once. But it happened "very rapidly"
Places that were solidly one color for over 60 years. Switched in the span of 20.
Republicans adopted again, southern strategy. You had the KKK literately openly support Nixon. which, again, as we know, Republicans (in name) supported civil rights. But that conflicts with their current image. Just like how Democrats modern image, doesn't fit their previous language either. If you did just the slightest analysis of their talking points, it would of also been obvious that a party switch happened.
Parties and their meaning change with time, just like words, just like gestures. Course, your going to go ahead and reject that too. Since already you dodged the KKK and Nixon situation. And tried to strawman me to hell and back. And just didn't do any thinking at all when I presented the maps to you.
