Homebrew Homebrew app sys-patch - sysmod that patches on boot

[impeeza]

So does sys-patch negate the need to switch from fusee to hekate for sigpatches on latest atmosphere?

Kinda, Sys-Patch is a sysmodule which patch the memory on the fly at startup, detect if any patch is already applied and if any patch is missing and apply them so if you didn't boot trough Hekate's Package3 parsing Sys-Patch will take care.

 

[hippy dave]

Kinda, Sys-Patch is a sysmodule which patch the memory on the fly at startup, detect if any patch is already applied and if any patch is missing and apply them so if you didn't boot trough Hekate's Package3 parsing Sys-Patch will take care.

Great ty.

 

[RealYoti]

What do you think fellow tempers about this release?

What about source code?

 

[impeeza]

What about source code?

will ask for permission.

 

[Blythe93]

Is it normal that log says Unpatched for es6?
Also, I have the latest sigpatches installed and I have loaded Atmosphere's package3 via Hekate. Shouldn't logs say Patched in orange instead of green or am I missing something? es6 is Unpatched, es7 is Patched and the rest of them are Patched.

 

[impeeza]

Is it normal that log says Unpatched for es6?

 

[zeomax]

im such a goofball i tried several times to scan with qr scanner before realizing to just click thanks for the link

I am kinda lost. Where is this thanks button?

 

[impeeza]

I am kinda lost. Where is this thanks button?

nop, you can Scan the QR or click on the QR to open the link.

 

[josete2k]

Is the es6 relevant?

 

[linuxares]

All I know is that ES have something to do with ES_NCA (or 0100000000000033) but not sure what ES6 is.
EDIT: Checked old backed up sourcecode, ES6 might not be in use anymore therefore not needed on FW18

constinit Patterns es_patterns[] = {
{ "es1", "0x1F90013128928052", -4, 0, cbz_cond, b_patch, b_applied, true, FW_VER_ANY, MAKEHOSVERSION(13,2,1) },
{ "es2", "0xC07240F9E1930091", -4, 0, tbz_cond, nop_patch, nop_applied, true, FW_VER_ANY, MAKEHOSVERSION(10,2,0) },
{ "es3", "0xF3031FAA02000014", -4, 0, bne_cond, nop_patch, nop_applied, true, FW_VER_ANY, MAKEHOSVERSION(10,2,0) },
{ "es4", "0xC0FDFF35A8C35838", -4, 0, mov_cond, nop_patch, nop_applied, true, MAKEHOSVERSION(11,0,0), MAKEHOSVERSION(13,2,1) },
{ "es5", "0xE023009145EEFF97", -4, 0, cbz_cond, b_patch, b_applied, true, MAKEHOSVERSION(11,0,0), MAKEHOSVERSION(13,2,1) },
{ "es6", "0x.6300...0094A0..D1..FF97", 16, 0, mov2_cond, mov0_patch, mov0_applied, true, MAKEHOSVERSION(14,0,0) },
};

So I guess es7 is just a replacement for es6

 

[impeeza]

Is the es6 relevant?

ES6 and ES7 are the 2 versions of the set of patterns to seek ES6 is for FW 14 to 17 and ES7 is for FW 14 to 18 I think they booth are overlapping, but if one of the two is patched, then the patch is applied.:

the pattern sys-patch broke on this fw, which is my fault. the change that broke was `reg0 = reg29 & 0x18` to `reg0 = reg29 & 0x1B`.

A0.0091..0094A0..D1..FF97 should be fine for fw14+

as far I could understand the code needs to change the reg pattern to look but on the new code just a new set of codes was added.

 

[Blythe93]

View attachment 428557

I know about that, but nevertheless, I've figured it out. For some reason, my hekate_ipl was missing the kip1patch=nosigchk line. Now they are all orange which means that both sigpatches and sys-patch module are working (and doing the same thing).

ES6 and ES7 are the 2 versions of the set of patterns to seek ES6 is for FW 14 to 17 and ES7 is for FW 14 to 18 I think they booth are overlapping, but if one of the two is patched, then the patch is applied.:

I see. Thanks for the info.

Thanks to everyone who made these sigpatches possible. You guys rock!

 

[RedColoredStars]

I know about that, but nevertheless, I've figured it out. For some reason, my hekate_ipl was missing the kip1patch=nosigchk line. Now they are all orange which means that both sigpatches and sys-patch module are working (and doing the same thing).

I see. Thanks for the info.

Thanks to everyone who made these sigpatches possible. You guys rock!

Mine are orange except for ctest, which is green. Is that supposed to be green with both sigpatches and sys-patch?

I also noticed in the sys-patch options that Patch sysMMC is set to on by default. Shouldn't that be set to off?

And what exactly is Version Skip for? Config says 1=(default) skips out of date patterns, 0=search all patterns. Anyone know the benefit or disadvantage of using one or the other?

 

[LightBeam]

What do you think fellow tempers about this release?:


View attachment 428368

Well you can get it from the "no so usual" place.

 

[impeeza]

Mine are orange except for ctest, which is green. Is that supposed to be green with both sigpatches and sys-patch?

I also noticed in the sys-patch options that Patch sysMMC is set to on by default. Shouldn't that be set to off?

And what exactly is Version Skip for? Config says 1=(default) skips out of date patterns, 0=search all patterns. Anyone know the benefit or disadvantage of using one or the other?

https://gbatemp.net/threads/sys-patch-sysmod-that-patches-on-boot.633517/post-10389638

 

[LightBeam]

Mine are orange except for ctest, which is green. Is that supposed to be green with both sigpatches and sys-patch?

I also noticed in the sys-patch options that Patch sysMMC is set to on by default. Shouldn't that be set to off?

And what exactly is Version Skip for? Config says 1=(default) skips out of date patterns, 0=search all patterns. Anyone know the benefit or disadvantage of using one or the other?

Green = patched correctly
Orange = already patched (by the sigpatches you already installed)

I don't remember what the version skip does



(woops got passed over)

 

[impeeza]

View attachment 428584

thanks but I am only the messenger

Post automatically merged: Mar 29, 2024

Green = patched correctly
Orange = already patched (by the sigpatches you already installed)

I don't remember what the version skip does

Unpatched = the pattern was not found so no need to be patched.

 

[LightBeam]

Unpatched = the pattern was not found so no need to be patched.

So if I understand correctly, with the version skip OFF it just applies everything, with version skip ON it apply just what it needs ?

 

[impeeza]

So if I understand correctly, with the version skip OFF it just applies everything, with version skip ON it apply just what it needs ?

As far I know, you are correct!

I am learning too.

 

[RedColoredStars]

https://gbatemp.net/threads/sys-patch-sysmod-that-patches-on-boot.633517/post-10389638

That didn't answer my questions.

Let me ask the first one in a different way. If they should all be orange if I have both sigpatches and sys-patch, what would be the reason my ctest is the only one that's green? As far as the other two, the post you linked to (whih I had already seen) doesn't mention either the Patch sysMMC or Version Skip options.

Edit: Version Skip was answered while I was replying.