Really? I never knew something so obvious could be SO illegal.Nintendo's site also says that any Nintendo Emulator is illegal.
Really? I never knew something so obvious could be SO illegal.Nintendo's site also says that any Nintendo Emulator is illegal.
QUOTE said:Can Websites and/or Internet Content Providers be Held Liable for Violation of Intellectual Property Rights if they are Only Providing Links to Illegal Software and/or Other Illegal Devices?
Yes. Personal Websites and/or Internet Content Providers sites That link to Nintendo ROMs, Nintendo emulators and/or illegal copying devices can be held liable for copyright and trademark violations, regardless of whether the illegal software and/or devices are on their site or whether they are linking to the sites where the illegal items are found.
If the emulator doesn't contain copywritten code, its not illegal.
Quite a few of the statements on their Legal page are bs.
No...go home. That makes NO sense at all.If the emulator doesn't contain copywritten code, its not illegal.
Quite a few of the statements on their Legal page are bs.
Only correct if said emulator was used for "educational" purposes. *wink wink nudge nudge*
The legality of its use is completely up to what the end-user does with it. That isn't the developer's problem.If the emulator doesn't contain copywritten code, its not illegal.
Quite a few of the statements on their Legal page are bs.
Only correct if said emulator was used for "educational" purposes. *wink wink nudge nudge*
No...go home. That makes NO sense at all.
And in case anyone was wondering, I'm the current patent holder for ducks and duck-based utility vehicles.No...go home. That makes NO sense at all.
What do you mean it makes no sense? Emulators are all illegal because they try to reproduce the process of a vendor specific product. However, you're allowed to develop an emulator if the development process was used for learning.
Ex: If you reverse engineer a duck
You can remake the duck, and it'll look like a duck, sound like a duck, move like a duck.
But a successfully reproduced duck duplicates the process/function of a patented process which makes it illegal.
And in case anyone was wondering, I'm the current patent holder for ducks.
And in case anyone was wondering, I'm the current patent holder for ducks.
That means I have to pay you royalties for using that duck analogy.
Its only illegal if you don't have the game, running the game on your R4 is a BACKUP, you downloaded the game, and ran it because.... perhaps you didn't want to ruin your original.
thats still totally illegal lolIts only illegal if you don't have the game, running the game on your R4 is a BACKUP, you downloaded the game, and ran it because.... perhaps you didn't want to ruin your original.
or maybe it's a backup of a game that you eventually might get.
I dont care about the law, I care what I think is wright and wrong
I dont care about the law, I care what I think is wright and wrong
Been playing too much Phoenix
Does the R4 contain copyrighted code?
I don't think so, since the encryption has been broken by Martin Korth, they need not use real game boot code anymore. But every unlicensed product on a closed platform is subject to copyright issues. Albeit some old war between intellivision and atari has settled that such copyright is absusive.Does the R4 contain copyrighted code?
I think it contains copyrighted boot codes or something like that.