Yeah, Puzzle Quest Challenge of the Warlords, Final Fantasy IV, and TWEWY are undoubtedly the 3 greatest RPGs on the DS as far as I'm concerned. I've got pretty high hopes for Infinite Space too.
Granville I only seen it done once before than Chrono Trigger. Yes it's one a different system the Snes. The game called Secrets of Evermore, great game.granville said:@Guild-
Dude, what game has taken and done time travel "better" than Chrono Trigger (in a similar style or whatever). Because i want to play that game. I've never seen time travel done as well as it was in CT. Rarely have i ever even seen it done in games period.
And how can the same game (FF4) be boring on one system but not the other? Especially when all it really adds up to is updated graphics?
Lastly, i'd wonder how someone can fault KH for being repetitive and not Pokemon. No offense. The rest of your opinions are your own and fair.
SoE is one of my favorite SNES RPGs. Some really great writing in that game, lots of humor. Similar gameplay to the Mana series, but IMO done better in a lot of ways.taken said:Granville I only seen it done once before than Chrono Trigger. Yes it's one a different system the Snes. The game called Secrets of Evermore, great game.granville said:@Guild-
Dude, what game has taken and done time travel "better" than Chrono Trigger (in a similar style or whatever). Because i want to play that game. I've never seen time travel done as well as it was in CT. Rarely have i ever even seen it done in games period.
And how can the same game (FF4) be boring on one system but not the other? Especially when all it really adds up to is updated graphics?
Lastly, i'd wonder how someone can fault KH for being repetitive and not Pokemon. No offense. The rest of your opinions are your own and fair.
granville said:@Guild-
Dude, what game has taken and done time travel "better" than Chrono Trigger (in a similar style or whatever). Because i want to play that game. I've never seen time travel done as well as it was in CT. Rarely have i ever even seen it done in games period. Just because it did time travel well doesn't mean it's a great game. I can make a video game about animals who shoot lasers out of their bums and say that no game handles bum laser shooting animals better. It's not a bad game, but really, I just find it to be good at best.
And how can the same game (FF4) be boring on one system but not the other? Especially when all it really adds up to is updated graphics? If you want to know, I have no fucking clue. I picked up FFIV DS a bunch of times and it was snoozeville. Picked up the GBA version and played that a lot. It's hard to explain. Maybe the cutscenes were long winded or something, IDK
Lastly, i'd wonder how someone can fault KH for being repetitive and not Pokemon. No offense. The rest of your opinions are your own and fair. Pokemon is "repetitive" as a series. 358/2 was incredibly repetitive, you can't argue that. A small amount of locales combined with near-identical missions time and time again. In the end it became hack, slash, repeat. For the entire game. At least the first KH and the like had larger, more various locales so it provided something relatively new as you progressed through the story. Pokemon may be "repetitive" from game to game, but it's a gameplay formula that was fantastic in the beginning. Yes, it's losing steam, I can acknowledge that, but it's still a game that fits the handheld like a glove. Hundreds of play hours, tons of strategy, etc.
choconado said:I'm sorry, but I still have to take umbrage with the roof raising over Pokemon. "man hours" don't a good game make. I have to agree with those that criticize you saying that KH is repetitive and then saying how you think pokemon is worthwhile. It's the same game it was 12 years ago, with very minimal graphic improvement, and barely more innovation than a sports franchise.
Yes, it's long, but that's because it just sits there and banks on the OCD that video games/mass marketing have instilled in people that a complete set is worth more than a fun one.