First of all, your opinion (of which I think you have against anyone who disagrees with you, so I don't feel offended).
Second of all, welcome to forums. The thread would be equally long, if not longer, if the news said that nintendo was NOT working on a new console. Probably with the same participants as nay-sayers.
You've chosen a bad example for a mobile game. The Zelda games that used the touchscreen for controls (phantom hourglass, spirit tracks) were considered the worst ones. And the "it's still Zelda" certainly doesn't hold up if you bring the CD-i into things.
Again: your common sense fails to address the fact that those subscription based programs are business-related. Here's a story from my days: one of our employees had us order some fancy-ass graphic program (it wasn't photoshop, but something similar). As is usual, it went through all stages of purchases because "he really needed it for his work". Despite already working fine without it for years. So the moment it came through (in a fine case and with a color manual of over 200 pages), we immediately warned the guy. Alas, he was 'busy', so we couldn't install it that day. He'd get back to us. After a few days, we sent him a reminder mail. Then called again the next week. And so on for nearly a month. You see where this is going? It's business logic. Since it's not your own money you're spending, there is no reason to hold back. The guy most likely wanted to put knowledge of that program on his resume, and his boss probably just had to spend his budget (or else he would have gotten a smaller budget the next year). It's about prestige and power. If nothing else, it showed that guy what he could get away with in the company (it wouldn't surprise me if he asked for a raise that same month). By the time it was found out that the program wasn't really needed to begin with, management was too embarrassed to admit it.
Now compare that to a subscription based service. Not only is the initial cost much lower so it can be granted to the entire department aside from "that guy" who complains the hardest, there is actual reason to check who actually USES the stuff on a monthly basis. And cancel it out on 'those guys' who just wanted it on their resume.
You can believe they changed their model to increase sales, and I won't contest that...but I was talking about actual profits on their end. If you sell your stuff for 1/50th of the price, you need to sell 50 times as much...on a monthly basis. What you're leaving out of the equation is the fact that there are now plenty of much cheaper or even free alternatives available.
I see your point. But we are talking about big, well established companies, with highly sought after products, such as Adobe or Nintendo.
The subscription based model works for big companies, because if you drop the price, the sales increase due to the amount of people who wanted your product in the first place, and that can now buy it.
Photoshop or Nintendo games, are two of the worlds most wanted items, so I believe this will work well. I could never afford Photoshop, until they introduced the monthly subscription service. I went from not having even a single copy of Photoshop, to having almost all of their products at my disposal (Photoshop, illustrator, flash, etc).
Either way I guess time will tell.
Another thing though, when I mentioned playing Zelda games, I did not mean to play using touch controls. All you need is a Bluetooth controller for less than 30$ and your good to go. All the games I play on my mobiles have control support. I wouldn't have it any other way.
I would love to be able to play Zelda, Super smash, Metroid or Mario Party on my tablet.