Gaming Did third party developers make good money on the Wii ?

Did third party developers make good money on the Wii ?


  • Total voters
    15

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,828
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,861
Country
Poland
I think that also has at least something to do with the self-fulfilling prophecy that the Wii was a kids' console.
That may be. It definitely has a more family-friendly, casual line-up, that's for sure. Nintendo strongly stressed the mythical idea of "family gaming" at the time, so I wouldn't be surprised if developers were afraid to release anything that wouldn't fit that idea. Sure, there's some games for mature audiences on the system, but again, few and far between. Of course that being said, I think that their primary motivation was sales more than anything - if "mature" games did poorly on the system, they just didn't develop any.
 

Harsky

Madmin
Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
5,562
Trophies
1
XP
3,851
Country
United Kingdom
Can't find an accurate source but back in 2007, Ubisoft says the Wii and DS games sales help fund development of games for the 360 and PS3.
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,828
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,861
Country
Poland
Can't find an accurate source but back in 2007, Ubisoft says the Wii and DS games sales help fund development of games for the 360 and PS3.
That's... pretty sad. I can already imagine that board meeting:

"Okay guys, Assassin's Creed 2 is almost ready, but we need an extra 2 million bucks to polish it nicely"
"Alright, halt production! It's time for another Imagine game!"
"What shall we make this time?"
"Hmmm... The olympics are just around the corner, how about... Imagine: Gymnast?"
"Fuc*ing.Nailed.It."
"IT PRINTS MONEY! ;O;"

:rofl2:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thomas83Lin

JoostinOnline

Certified Crash Test Dummy
Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
11,005
Trophies
1
Location
The Twilight Zone
Website
www.hacksden.com
XP
4,339
Country
United States
That's... pretty sad. I can already imagine that board meeting:

"Okay guys, Assassin's Creed 2 is almost ready, but we need an extra 2 million bucks to polish it nicely"
"Alright, halt production! It's time for another Imagine game!"
"What shall we make this time?"
"Hmmm... The olympics are just around the corner, how about... Imagine: Gymnast?"
"Fuc*ing.Nailed.It."
"IT PRINTS MONEY! ;O;"

:rofl2:
You know some people really enjoy those kinds of games.
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,828
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,861
Country
Poland
You know some people really enjoy those kinds of games.
I'm fully aware of that, I was just making a joke. :rofl2:

If there are people who enjoy Facebook games then there sure as hell are people who enjoy Imagine titles, and I'd imagine that they can be counted in the thousands - that's the whole reason for releasing this sort of thing. ;)
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,798
Trophies
3
XP
28,373
Country
United Kingdom
I am usually opposed to and pick on those that make such statements but... call it "you have to try it before you can knock it".

Surely one has to look no further than the last few years of the Wii where it was basically a game release desert; for all the malice falsely assumed to exist in many game companies they will still go where the money is, give or take nasty insults (stuff like Sony up and making the PS1 after Nintendo did a number on them and Square in the PS1 era).

Also "Nintendo was always a first party"... so of their commercial and critical successes the bulk were seriously augmented by third parties from what I can see (the GBA even appeared alongside the PS2). The sole exception was the Wii and now we have a thread like this. Bonus is most seem to have dropped the 3ds now andrios is viable, such a thing leading to me claiming "no gaems games" for the 3ds on more than one occasion (this is the third year of it after all http://gbatemp.net/threads/5-years-of-ds-roms-in-5-days-year-3.236882/ ).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foxi4
D

Dork

Guest
Unfortunately, third-party on the Wii never fared well. The majority of Wii owners hardly even played video games in the first place and it was truly a "casual" audience.

If you want to look at this from a hardware perspective, multiplat titles were just better on PS3 and 360 anyway since you a multitude of features separate from the Wii, and of course you had better visuals. The 7th generation was mainly having a Wii for Nintendo games and a PS3 or 360 for multiplats and whatever exclusives offered on said platform.
 

JoostinOnline

Certified Crash Test Dummy
Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
11,005
Trophies
1
Location
The Twilight Zone
Website
www.hacksden.com
XP
4,339
Country
United States
Unfortunately, third-party on the Wii never fared well. The majority of Wii owners hardly even played video games in the first place and it was truly a "casual" audience.
You got some stats to back that up? I'd particularly be interested in some that said most Wii owners never used their Wii.
 
D

Dork

Guest
You got some stats to back that up? I'd particularly be interested in some that said most Wii owners never used their Wii.
Not that they never ever played games, but they got it for the motion-control fad and Wii Sports.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_Wii_video_games

Take notice how Wii Sports sold approx. 81.99 million, almost as much as the entire Wii userbase.

Now take a look at more of Nintendo's core games like Super Mario Galaxy and Super Smash Bros. Brawl.

Very little in comparison. Obviously third-parties have done much worse in comparison to those (not implying that those are bad stats).
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,828
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,861
Country
Poland
You got some stats to back that up? I'd particularly be interested in some that said most Wii owners never used their Wii.
I have found some graphs, but they only indicate the first few months of the Wii's life cycle. They show that third-party software actually sold very well in the beginning, but I'm also reading that the so-called "Wii bubble" deflated over time. Even Iwata admitted that third party sales on the Wii are "especially low", so there you have it. Looking for more relevant charts that would take the system's whole life cycle into consideration, but so far I haven't found anything.
 

Wisenheimer

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2013
Messages
377
Trophies
0
Age
35
XP
246
Country
United States
There were not a whole lot of big budget third party titles developed exclusively for the Wii, but then again, the same could be said of Xbox.

What the Wii was missing was a lot of AAA ports, unsuprising since Nintendo did not make its big GPU jump until this generation so it was just too slow to be worth releasing AAA ports for in many cases.
 

JoostinOnline

Certified Crash Test Dummy
Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
11,005
Trophies
1
Location
The Twilight Zone
Website
www.hacksden.com
XP
4,339
Country
United States
Not that they never ever played games, but they got it for the motion-control fad and Wii Sports.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_Wii_video_games

Take notice how Wii Sports sold approx. 81.99 million, almost as much as the entire Wii userbase.

Now take a look at more of Nintendo's core games like Super Mario Galaxy and Super Smash Bros. Brawl.

Very little in comparison. Obviously third-parties have done much worse in comparison to those (not implying that those are bad stats).
Time for another list
  1. That's an incomplete (and therefore inaccurate) list. You don't know what the actual top-selling games were.
  2. Wii Sports came with almost every Wii (I don't know if it came with the bundles), so of course it's at the top. Nobody actually paid for it, because it wasn't for sale (except for used). It would be literally impossible to for it to not be at the top.
  3. Enjoying motion control (which I happened to love, and I consider myself a gamer) has absolutely nothing to do with third party games.
  4. You're once again pretending you know what everybody thinks by expressing "the reason" they bought something
  5. Doing "much worse" (which you have yet to back up) than some of the best selling games of the generation isn't even close to meaning not making money.
 

Wisenheimer

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2013
Messages
377
Trophies
0
Age
35
XP
246
Country
United States
I think that also has at least something to do with the self-fulfilling prophecy that the Wii was a kids' console.

That seems doubtful. At least in the US, Wii sales were pretty even across the board with the exception of college aged adults, where it sold disproportionately well. PS3 sold disproportionately well among elderly people (those over 40) , and if I recall, the 360 might have done better in the under 18 crowd.
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,828
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,861
Country
Poland
iee9u2Q.jpg

:arrow: Source

Again, this is data from waaay back and I still can't find any more recent tie ratios, nothing beyond 2007-2008.

Its obvious that a good chunk of third party did well on the Wii such as Just Dance and Madworld but without the numbers we can't really tell how well.
According to
Wikipedia, despite encouraging launch sales figures, MadWorld bombed (or, in fact, most of SEGA's "Mature" games on the Wii did), hence no sequel. Instead, Jack starred in Anarchy Reigns on the competition's systems.
 
D

Dork

Guest
Time for another list
  1. That's an incomplete (and therefore inaccurate) list. You don't know what the actual top-selling games were.
  2. Wii Sports came with almost every Wii (I don't know if it came with the bundles), so of course it's at the top. Nobody actually paid for it, because it wasn't for sale (except for used). It would be literally impossible to for it to not be at the top.
  3. Enjoying motion control (which I happened to love, and I consider myself a gamer) has absolutely nothing to do with third party games.
  4. You're once again pretending you know what everybody thinks by expressing "the reason" they bought something
  5. Doing "much worse" (which you have yet to back up) than some of the best selling games of the generation isn't even close to meaning not making money.
What do you want me to do? Provide modern sales figures for every major third-party Wii game and perform multiple surveys to find out everyone's personal intentions for buying a Wii? I'm only talking about the general consensus at a very simple small level. If you want to get that deep into it, you're gonna have to do that research.
 

JoostinOnline

Certified Crash Test Dummy
Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
11,005
Trophies
1
Location
The Twilight Zone
Website
www.hacksden.com
XP
4,339
Country
United States
What do you want me to do? Provide modern sales figures for every major third-party Wii game and perform multiple surveys to find out everyone's personal intentions for buying a Wii? I'm only talking about the general consensus at a very simple small level. If you want to get that deep into it, you're gonna have to do that research.
No, I want you to have at least a tiny bit of proof before you start saying stuff. A huge part of your argument was based on a false assumption that most people purchased Wii Sports, when NOBODY purchased it (at least new).
 
D

Dork

Guest
No, I want you to have at least a tiny bit of proof before you start saying stuff. A huge part of your argument was based on a false assumption that most people purchased Wii Sports, when NOBODY purchased it (at least new).
What? Just look at that the stats I posted. Since Wii Sports was bundled with every console, every Wii owner must own a copy. Using that link that should be around 81.99 million. Now look at the next game on that list. New Super Mario Bros. Wii - 35.26 million. That's a pretty big gap don't you think? About 46.73 million Wii owners didn't buy the most statistically purchased game. Look at Call of Duty: World at War, only sold a little over 1 million. You can already see that gap.

Again that's not entirely accurate and if you want to get better statistics you can. I'm only securing that fact that a majority of Wii owners only got a Wii for the motion control fad (and don't take that the wrong way, I never insulted the Wiimote and I like it too.)
 

JoostinOnline

Certified Crash Test Dummy
Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
11,005
Trophies
1
Location
The Twilight Zone
Website
www.hacksden.com
XP
4,339
Country
United States
What? Just look at that the stats I posted. Since Wii Sports was bundled with every console, every Wii owner must own a copy. Using that link that should be around 81.99 million. Now look at the next game on that list. New Super Mario Bros. Wii - 35.26 million. That's a pretty big gap don't you think? About 46.73 million Wii owners didn't buy the most statistically purchased game.
There were more games on the Wii than on any other system of the generation. With so many options, it's surprising that even half of Wii owners bought that game.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    NinStar @ NinStar: you can't turn link into a femboy in tears of the kingdom