FYI nobody is dropping or "picking up" 32 bit Windows compatibility in this thread, AFAIK TWLTool 1.6 code is fairly portable, it's just there's only a Windows 64 bit binary in the OP.
So you accept there is no real reason twltool needs 64 bit, but people just have to endure a barrage of insults if they ask for a binary.
other than that, there's no "relatively recent hardware limited to 32 bit" AFAIK.
Isn't one example enough to disprove your point about all hardware being able to run 64 bit? Or are you saying people deserve insults for not ditching 32bit windows in favour of 64bit linux?
I've only ever used twltool 1.6, it has a brilliant addition that it checks that the keys you have given are correct. Which was useful when I was getting the wrong CID from fwtool using an original sudokuhax v2 installation in conjunction with homebrew channel circa 2011 (I figured out later that if I use hbmenu instead then it works).
Last edited by smf,