the ds won't replace the gba"Night Trap will never appear on a Nintendo Console." Nintendo of America President, Howard Lincoln during the 1994 congressional hearings on video game violence.
Well at least they're honest.
the ds won't replace the gba"Night Trap will never appear on a Nintendo Console." Nintendo of America President, Howard Lincoln during the 1994 congressional hearings on video game violence.
Well at least they're honest.
That wasn't ever said at a senate hearing on the record in front of government officials.the ds won't replace the gba
Have you also noticed that Nintendo seems to be more strict on their third party policies? The reason this PORT isn't coming to the Switch differs from why we're getting NEW shovelware. The game flopped once. The genre already died. What good business sense can come from this? If they accepted it? That's saying they'll accept any trashed port of a failed 90s game.You obviously did not realise what i wrote exactly. I HAVE a neo geo and i love it. I HAVE jrpgs and i love them. i HAVE indies and i love them. However, compared to how mediocre some generalised jrpgs have become and how boring some indies have become, my answer was that i would play this instead for a spin. Nowhere did i say there are no good indies, jrpgs or neo geo titles.
Taste is personal. I already said it is not the best game. I would play it out of interest and nostalgia, not because i think it is the best.
However, it does not matter to me the slightest bit if the press and people like a game, if i dont. Everybody gave BOTW 10. I disagree. You say splatoon is hailed, but all i see is a nintendo's clone of COD for the nintendo fanbase. Tried it, not for me, much like 99% of online games or games leaning heavily on the online side.
However, here is where you are wrong: Personal taste has NOTHING TO DO with releasing games or not. If we would simply decide as fans which games should and should not be released, i would object to Splatoon for example. Why spend precious development time on it rather than let's say Metroid? Or F-Zero?
So, releasing something should really only be about business, variety and openness. After all, i said it before, the Wii was the biggest shovelware party together with the Ps2. You dont like it, dont buy it. I am happy YOU can find games you like, so why you would not be happy for something someone else might enjoy is beyond me, no matter how crap you think it is.
Yes I understand what your saying it does need "exposure" for the site to tell others what up and coming titles are for the Nintendo Switch but this guy doesn't give anyone else a chance who would possibly like to post Nintendo Switch content as well but he posts threads up like its going out of fashion you only have to look at the main columns! and like I said who died and made him King of the Nintendo Switch threads!"But the Switch needs more exposure and more games"
And to that i say it doesn't, the Switch already had enough exposure and it does have games and more games are coming out this year.
You mention business. Nintendo is a business and the marketing team will constantly evaluate trends, figures, and what is selling versus what is not. That's why it's not a good idea to allocate advertising and server-hosting resources to something when it could be filled with something that will make them money.However, here is where you are wrong: Personal taste has NOTHING TO DO with releasing games or not. If we would simply decide as fans which games should and should not be released, i would object to Splatoon for example. Why spend precious development time on it rather than let's say Metroid? Or F-Zero?
So, releasing something should really only be about business, variety and openness. After all, i said it before, the Wii was the biggest shovelware party together with the Ps2. You dont like it, dont buy it. I am happy YOU can find games you like, so why you would not be happy for something someone else might enjoy is beyond me, no matter how crap you think it is.
wheres the legal document they signed locking this in?That wasn't ever said at a senate hearing on the record in front of government officials.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Record as a statement "for the record", meaning it has been published somewhere in there as a "secondary authority".wheres the legal document they signed locking this in?
you get one for lasting more than 10 minutes with thisi wonder how the trophy support is?
though I suppose if they wanted to they could just go jp only or not in the us in general but everywhere else and say those words were only thoughts of the us devision of Nintendo, though who knows what Nintendo will do next, they are pretty unpredictable at timeshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Record as a statement "for the record", meaning it has been published somewhere in there as a "secondary authority".
and more on how to get a record: https://www.senate.gov/reference/common/faq/how_to_committe_hrg.htm but they only seem to have house records here, I'm sure there's some horrendous roundabout way to get a copy.
nothing explicitly signed, however it is generally more embarrassing to turn your back on what you say in a courtroom testimony than to disallow a title from sale. Their statement about the GBA doesn't leave them looking shitty in the eyes of governance, turning on this is more likely to - albeit unlikely seeing as much has changed, but when has Nintendo been very ahead of the curve on anything? Again, Howard Lincoln is actually a lawyer, I'm unsurprised they would want to refer to his words in a hearing.
lol and i just ripped my sega cd copy to play on my retropie. did this because even thought i have all my sega cd games with me my sega cd itself is in Portugal at my parents house. i wonder how the trophy support is?
Really? Not a eternal champions hd game, maybe snatcher? Spiderman vs kingpin LUNAR? SHINING FORCE, POPFUL MAIL! You know games people actually care about. No is NIGHT TRAP, the most controversial game of 1992 next to mortal kombat.If there is a video game goddess, please help me now. I just want one thing. Mega Man 11.
Oh and umm.... could you please tell tecmo to stop making costume dlc for DOA5 THERE IS ENOUGH!
You mention business. Nintendo is a business and the marketing team will constantly evaluate trends, figures, and what is selling versus what is not. That's why it's not a good idea to allocate advertising and server-hosting resources to something when it could be filled with something that will make them money.
In my restaurant, if I see a promotion at other restaurants that turned out poor in sales and quality, there is no way I'm bringing that into my restaurant when I have the occasional one customer a month telling me I should have it on the menu. The cost of ingredients alone is not worth the lack of profit made on creating it for the immense minority of customers, never mind the cost of anything else to produce it.
Have you also noticed that Nintendo seems to be more strict on their third party policies? The reason this PORT isn't coming to the Switch differs from why we're getting NEW shovelware. The game flopped once. The genre already died. What good business sense can come from this? If they accepted it? That's saying they'll accept any trashed port of a failed 90s game.
Our opinions don't necessarily dictate the video game business. "If you don't like it, don't buy it." Right? Still costs money to host it, print it, market it..
One would think that, but here we are with a remaster of Night Trap of all games