Really!??they use their own arm9loaderhax payload. not compatible with existing setups, you need to downgrade to 2.1 and install their own, and you'll be stuck with it.
a lot if i can say a thing....Really!??
Well, that kinda sucks! Doesn't it?
Even if i already have the otp files pre compiled?they use their own arm9loaderhax payload. not compatible with existing setups, you need to downgrade to 2.1 and install their own, and you'll be stuck with it.
as it stands right now you have to go to 2.1 again, and install their own arm9loaderhax.Even if i already have the otp files pre compiled?
Hmm,as i remember,in a9lh I get the otp files then compile one of them then get back to sysnand9.2 then install the hax from the homebrew channel.as it stands right now you have to go to 2.1 again, and install their own arm9loaderhax.
yes you must be on 2.1 to install their a9lh. you won't be able to easily switch away from their fork either, so you'll be stuck with using GW only for now.Hmm,as i remember,in a9lh I get the otp files then compile one of them then get back to sysnand9.2 then install the hax from the homebrew channel.
Now in GW i need to install it on 2.1?
yes you must be on 2.1 to install their a9lh. you won't be able to easily switch away from their fork either, so you'll be stuck with using GW only for now.
Can we finally autoboot GW 4.0 launcher.dat with A9LH?
I use Ctrbootmanager9 to boot Luma or D9 but can I add a new entry for GW??
The problem is that GW's payloads aren't compatible with existing implementations.Maybe we can have:
-A9LH Sysnand
-A9L GW Emunand
Choose the one to boot with Luma? (Autoboot sysnand or emunand)
Well @liomajor already did it. But it basically had GW support hardcoded in it with a key. Which isn't ideal in my opinion (that would mean I can't put GW behind a password from a9lhay...).The problem is that GW's payloads aren't compatible with existing implementations.
That being said, it's possible to make an implementation that supports both. I may look into it if I feel like bricking later.
I'm aware liomajor implemented it into an arm9loaderhax payload itself, but I was talking about implementing it into a chainloader.Well @liomajor already did it. But it basically had GW support hardcoded in it with a key. Which isn't ideal in my opinion (that would mean I can't put GW behind a password from a9lhay...).
Really!??
Well, that kinda sucks! Doesn't it?
Nevermind I'm tired.Well @liomajor already did it. But it basically had GW support hardcoded in it with a key. Which isn't ideal in my opinion (that would mean I can't put GW behind a password from a9lhay...).
Or maybe I didn't get exactly what it did, not sure.
Don't forget to mention, if you downgrade using their tool on the New3DS, it will brick your system.they use their own arm9loaderhax payload. not compatible with existing setups, you need to downgrade to 2.1 and install their own, and you'll be stuck with it.