• Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.

Covid-19 vaccine

Will you get the vaccine?

  • Yes

    Votes: 500 67.1%
  • No

    Votes: 245 32.9%

  • Total voters
    745
Status
Not open for further replies.

NoobletCheese

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
534
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
1,087
Country
United States
You speak of rationality, yet avoid a vaccine which has been clinically shown to significantly reduce serious illness and death; bit difficult to reconcile how that is rational behavior.

Your statement is empirically unsound, but more importantly it's logically invalid.

I won't get into the empiricism because you'll just quote the establishment and think you've won the empirical debate.

So instead I'll show you the logical error you're making, because I know you still respond to that no matter what the establishment tells you. The establishment could give you bad logic and I think you'd reject it, which is not the same for their empirical claims.

So vegans have half the rate of high blood pressure, half the risk of type-2 diabetes, a 15–20% lower risk of cancer, and significantly lower cholesterol levels.
 

RetroGen

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2022
Messages
181
Trophies
0
Location
Home
XP
698
Country
Canada
The "establishment"...? So we're in conspiracyland now, where peer reviewed scientific studies are dismissed? OK... definitely not a rational discussion if scientific evidence is out of the picture. The best available science says that vaccination significantly mitigates the risk of serious illness and death from COVID-19 (I won't bother quoting more credible sources that will be dismissed). My decisions on this topic are made on the best available science, and I expect that any rational person would do the same. What's the logical error?

Lots of antivaxxers fail to realize that they are behaving just as they have been trained... they've been mis/disinformed so much that they no longer trust reliable sources, instead tending to believe the scientifically-ignorant strongman charlatans and influencers who fed them propaganda; this is a very deliberate, malicious, political strategy, designed to stoke tribalism. Critical thinking gets replaced with groupthink, dis/confirmation bias, backfire effect, etc.... Trump et al. have used this M.O. to great success, sadly to the detriment of millions. Carl Sagan would be utterly flabbergasted.
 

tabzer

This place is a meme.
Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
5,844
Trophies
1
Age
39
XP
4,911
Country
Japan
Like when Americans think that drinking chemicals would cure COVID.
I guess "offering" wasn't the word I was looking for. Social pressure in the absence of education and information is kind of the problem I see. I think the notion that Americans are willing to risk poisoning themselves of their own volition as opposed to giving into coercive methods speaks a bit bout the faith they have in their institutions.
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,828
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,861
Country
Poland
The law can say whatever it wants, it's not a source of truth.
Businesses must operate in accordance to the law.
I suppose if the law is informed by government agencies, those agencies wouldn't be a source of truth either.
The existence of my business and, by extension, my livelihood, is contingent on my compliance with the law. That’s the truth.
That's why I said there is an exception if informed consent was given. The key word there is informed - you can't really be informed if the primary safety endpoint of the phase 3 clinical trials hasn't been completed, and they had already given the products full approval and were imposing mandates long before this.
Logical fallacy. You being informed is not contingent on knowing information that is not yet available (on account of it not existing). You’re as informed as anybody else, if there are further developments then you’ll need to reevaluate.
I take the above to mean that you believe it's virtuous to not impose a mandate (since you personally wouldn't have one) but also that mandates are permissible (others can still impose mandates if they want to).
it doesn’t have to be virtuous - I just don’t think it’s any of my business.
In my view humans are obligated to behave rationally, so if the mandate is based on faulty reasoning then you're not permitted to have the mandate. Think of it as a rationality mandate which supersedes the vaccine mandate.
The expectation that other people will break the law (or their store policy for that matter) on your behalf is naive. My need to put food on the table supersedes your moral compass.
Also if a mandate entails force, and force entails obligation, then by permitting mandates you would be permitting that vaccines are obligatory, which is inconsistent with your personal decision to not have a mandate. An analogy might be allowing abortion in your state, but also allowing other states to illegalise it.
They’re not obligatory if you’re permitted to reject them. The fact that your choices have societal consequences does not entail punitive action from the government. Nobody has been out in prison for refusing to take the vaccine.
 

NoobletCheese

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
534
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
1,087
Country
United States
They’re not obligatory if you’re permitted to reject them.

"Mandates are optional" sounds like an oxymoron to me.

In your favour though, businesses could have a dress code which is essentially a mandate, and I'd agree it should be their option whether to have a dress code.

But what if the employer decided they are implementing a new dress code where you have to dress as the opposite gender, and the employer couldn't provide any good reason for it? Can they do this if it's not in your employment contract?

Businesses must operate in accordance to the law.

There are "wrongful dismissal" and "unfair dismissal" laws. If I signed a contract with my employer, and nowhere in that contract does it say I'll be required to take all these injections of genetic material which haven't been shown to stop the spread, and I can prove I'm not a Covid threat to them via negative testing and their vaccines giving them protection, this could be the basis for a wrongful/unfair dismissal case.

This document states: "All vaccines must be administered in accordance with the relevant legislation, best practice, and the guidelines and recommendations in this Handbook". The handbook states valid consent is required before administering vaccines, where one of the criteria is that it "must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation". So clinics shouldn't really be upholding the mandates. When the patient has to give consent, they should mention their employer is pressuring them to have it and the nurse should then not administer the vaccine. The patient would then have a slam dunk wrongful dismissal case as they followed all their employers instructions. It would be like firing a courier driver for not delivering a package to an inaccessible location.


Nobody has been out in prison for refusing to take the vaccine.

People were arrested for protesting the mandates in Canada and Australia, and anyone who shows up to work after being fired for not being vaccinated would be arrested and jailed for trespassing. That also happened to a teacher who didn't use transgender pronouns.
 
Last edited by NoobletCheese,

RedColoredStars

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2022
Messages
1,029
Trophies
0
Location
Vancouver
XP
1,344
Country
United States
People were arrested for protesting the mandates in Canada and Australia, and anyone who shows up to work after being fired for not being vaccinated would be arrested and jailed for trespassing. That also happened to a teacher who didn't use transgender pronouns.

I could comment on all the sheer absurdity of an awful lot of things you say but wtf? Wow. They weren't arrested for refusing to take the vaccine. So again, as Foxi stated, nobody has been out in prison for refusing to take the vaccine.
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,828
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,861
Country
Poland
"Mandates are optional" sounds like an oxymoron to me.

In your favour though, businesses could have a dress code which is essentially a mandate, and I'd agree it should be their option whether to have a dress code.
The government did not issue a mandate. Private citizens decided they don’t want you around anymore, there’s a huge difference.
But what if the employer decided they are implementing a new dress code where you have to dress as the opposite gender, and the employer couldn't provide any good reason for it? Can they do this if it's not in your employment contract?
If you think dressing up as a woman is the most ridiculous and absurd thing you’ve ever seen, you haven’t been to a mall in the last two centuries. People walk around dressed up as hot dogs, my guy.
There are "wrongful dismissal" and "unfair dismissal" laws. If I signed a contract with my employer, and nowhere in that contract does it say I'll be required to take all these injections of genetic material which haven't been shown to stop the spread, and I can prove I'm not a Covid threat to them via negative testing and their vaccines giving them protection, this could be the basis for a wrongful/unfair dismissal case.
We talked about this, scroll up. If you require me to repeat myself, you’re not listening, and that’s a sign of disrespect.
This document states: "All vaccines must be administered in accordance with the relevant legislation, best practice, and the guidelines and recommendations in this Handbook". The handbook states valid consent is required before administering vaccines, where one of the criteria is that it "must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation". So clinics shouldn't really be upholding the mandates. When the patient has to give consent, they should mention their employer is pressuring them to have it and the nurse should then not administer the vaccine. The patient would then have a slam dunk wrongful dismissal case as they followed all their employers instructions. It would be like firing a courier driver for not delivering a package to an inaccessible location.
There’s no mandate. You have to choose to vaccinate. This is another thing we already talked about.
People were arrested for protesting the mandates in Canada and Australia, and anyone who shows up to work after being fired for not being vaccinated would be arrested and jailed for trespassing. That also happened to a teacher who didn't use transgender pronouns.
So, nobody was arrested for refusing to take the vaccine then. Good, good.
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,828
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,861
Country
Poland
This mandate only covered federal workers, healthcare providers and any large company with over 100 employees, and had a built-in opt out provision that allowed workers to refuse the vaccine and choose to test themselves on a weekly basis instead. Where’s this imaginary mandate you speak of that excludes you from operating in civil society unless you vaccinate? You posted the link, but you didn’t read it, did you? You just typed in “vaccine mandate” and that’s the first thing that popped up, am I right?

At no point during the entire pandemic did the federal government *force* regular citizens to take the vaccine. In the case of government employees, the government *is* their employer and *can* set such requirements. It hasn’t done so for the regular Joe because it would likely be illegal for it to do so, for all the reasons I mentioned and more. In the case of healthcare professionals (which could opt out IIRC) the Department of Health sets the standard of medical care in the country, so yeah, they have a say in what requirements must be met. Vaccines were heavily incentivised, but not forced upon people. Your article states as much.
 
Last edited by Foxi4,
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Xzi and tabzer

NoobletCheese

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
534
Trophies
0
Age
25
XP
1,087
Country
United States
had a built-in opt out provision that allowed workers to refuse the vaccine and choose to test themselves on a weekly basis instead.

In the article it says "Biden had given federal workers the choice of undergoing regular testing instead of getting vaccinated, but that testing opt-out will no longer be an option"

edit: and shouldn't you be against the government forcing private companies to have testing mandates? I thought they were private companies and can do whatever they want?

the government is their employer and can set such requirements

The government isn't a private employer though - I thought that was your whole basis for allowing them to impose mandates?

And people who work in the public sector are still citizens, so it still meets the criteria of government forcing citizens to get jabbed. I don't see why it should matter if those citizens happen to work in the public sector. I don't think they should be classified as employees of the Biden administration either.


Where’s this imaginary mandate you speak of that excludes you from operating in civil society unless you vaccinate?

Earlier you said you were against vaccine passports -- do you not believe they exclude people from participating in society?

Here you can read about the horrors of vaccine passports in Europe: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1456627578354155526.html


Vaccines were heavily incentivised, but not forced upon people.

Anything with a punishment for noncompliance -- especially a severe punishment -- is forced. Otherwise what do you mean by forced? Are people forced to obey the law in your view?
Post automatically merged:


PolitiFact isnt a source of truth. I'd be wary of any such groups who appoint themselves as a truth telling authority. Most people aren't aware that it's possible to write a lengthy article where every sentence is true, and yet the article itself still a lie. It's called lying by omission and it's absolutely rife in this post truth world we now live in.

And Trump's claims about ingesting disinfectant turned out to be true in the form of daily nasal rinsing and throat gargling with iodine. I use it myself after being in crowded areas for extended periods of time, no Covid yet.
 
Last edited by NoobletCheese,

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,828
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,861
Country
Poland
In the article it says "Biden had given federal workers the choice of undergoing regular testing instead of getting vaccinated, but that testing opt-out will no longer be an option"

edit: and shouldn't you be against the government forcing private companies to have testing mandates? I thought they were private companies and can do whatever they want?

The government isn't a private employer though - I thought that was your whole basis for allowing them to impose mandates?
Your employer sets the policy, whether it’s in the private or public sector is immaterial - they have a duty of care in regards to their workforce. If I’m paying you cash money to do X, it is up to me to decide how you do it and in what circumstances. If you don’t like the way I want things done, you can leave at any time. For the record, the mandate didn’t compel workers to vaccinate - it compelled employers to ensure their workforce is vaccinated. You, the employee, weren’t forced to do anything at all. No government stooge showed up at your door. The government did not issue a mandate that forced private citizens to vaccinate at any point during the pandemic. Maybe it did in your neck of the woods (you’d have to demonstrate it first), but this is not an example of one.
And people who work in the public sector are still citizens, so it still meets the criteria of government forcing citizens to get jabbed. I don't see why it should matter if those citizens happen to work in the public sector. I don't think they should be classified as employees of the Biden administration either.
People who work for the government are one step removed from lizards.
Earlier you said you were against vaccine passports -- do you not believe they exclude people from participating in society?
What I believe doesn’t matter because we’re discussing objective reality. You keep trying to make this a discussion about hypotheticals, but these are not hypotheticals, these are things that actually happened.
Here you can read about the horrors of vaccine passports in Europe: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1456627578354155526.html
I’m *from* Europe and I live *in* Europe. I don’t have to read it, I can look outside my window.
Anything with a punishment for noncompliance -- especially a severe punishment -- is forced. Otherwise what do you mean by forced? Are people forced to obey the law in your view?
What is the legal punishment for non-compliance here? How many years do I have to spend in prison for not taking the jab? How much do I have to pay? If the answer to both is zero then there’s no punitive action - you are not entitled to a job. You get to have a job solely at your employer’s discretion, contingent on whether or not you fulfil the employer’s requirements to perform it. The government has decided that any workplace with 100+ employees (which would be considered a mass gathering) is safer if the employees were vaccinated, and the employers were told to ensure that their workforce is jabbed. *You* as a private citizen don’t factor into this order in any capacity. *You* are not at risk of punitive action from the government - you’re not being fined and you’re not being imprisoned, which are the only two punitive measures the government is capable of deploying. The law is enforced at the threat of those measures, and no other. The employer might be if they fail to meet government standards for their entity, but that’s an imposition on them, not on you. They’re at risk of being non-compliant if they go against it, not you.
 

tabzer

This place is a meme.
Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
5,844
Trophies
1
Age
39
XP
4,911
Country
Japan
Mandates happened. For the same reason you argue that the government "requesting" something from you is a pressure, requiring you to opt-in for A or opt for B is a mandate nonetheless.
 

AncientBoi

THEE GAY WARLORD™ - Defender of GAY Rights
Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
4,027
Trophies
2
Age
67
Location
On the Patio NaKeD w/COFFEE
XP
13,677
Country
United States
Ahh yes the COVID Shot.

I remember when I went in for the first one. At the time for the shot, I automatically got up, pulled my pants down and bent over. The nurse said: :ohnoes::O What Are You Doing? I replied: It's a shot right? :)

:blush: Sir, it goes in your arm.
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,828
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,861
Country
Poland
Mandates happened. For the same reason you argue that the government "requesting" something from you is a pressure, requiring you to opt-in for A or opt for B is a mandate nonetheless.
A specific claim was made - that there was some kind of mandate that excluded you from operating in commerce or civil society unless you vaccinated. That is not the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi

mrdude

Developer
Developer
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
3,071
Trophies
1
Age
56
XP
8,227
A specific claim was made - that there was some kind of mandate that excluded you from operating in commerce or civil society unless you vaccinated. That is not the case.
It depends where you lived. A lot of people were coerced into getting jabbed and many lost their jobs because they wouldn't take it - especially in UK that worked for NHS. People were banned from going to concerts etc and were treated like second class citizens and told they needed to show a vaccine certificate to get into clubs etc. Coercion and being forced to get jabbed or be jobless and potentially homeless if you didn't comply with a forced procedure is something expected from North Korea or in times past, the Nazi's.
You can mince your words and play with the meaning of words all you wish, but yes in essence there was a mandate for a large amount of people to be jabbed and those that didn't comply suffered in more ways than one.
 

Foxi4

Endless Trash
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
30,828
Trophies
3
Location
Gaming Grotto
XP
29,861
Country
Poland
It depends where you lived. A lot of people were coerced into getting jabbed and many lost their jobs because they wouldn't take it - especially in UK that worked for NHS. People were banned from going to concerts etc and were treated like second class citizens and told they needed to show a vaccine certificate to get into clubs etc. Coercion and being forced to get jabbed or be jobless and potentially homeless if you didn't comply with a forced procedure is something expected from North Korea or in times past, the Nazi's.
You can mince your words and play with the meaning of words all you wish, but yes in essence there was a mandate for a large amount of people to be jabbed and those that didn't comply suffered in more ways than one.
…or what? That’s where this argument breaks down - get jabbed or what? I’m sorry that some of the regulations affected your day-to-day - I’m in the UK and I hate to break this to you, but people were just fine. As far as NHS workers are concerned, yeah, I expect my healthcare providers to be fully vaccinated. If they refuse, they need to find a different line of employment. It’s 100% part of the job to be immunised against the diseases you’re supposed to be treating. If you cannot do that, it’s not a job for you. As for concerts and other social gatherings, those are not necessities. I haven’t gone to a full-blown concert in years - not because of COVID but because it’s not one of my interests. Absolutely nothing changed about my life throughout the course of the pandemic besides having to wear a mask and getting paid leave, I can’t complain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xzi
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: Lol Veho.