(EDIT: note: this post was a reply to prlwr.)
Not really. Price is another factor. I've read swami's post, but the logic that works for a client doesn't really apply to a business model.
First up: a hard drive is an investment in EVERY console, not just the ones sold. And 50 bucks for a hard drive (PER MACHINE) may not sound like much, it will be added in the selling price. And if the price is too high, people will refrain from buying one. To put it to the extreme: I'm sure nintendo can put together a console that has all the latest CPU power, HD (or beyond) quality, way more memory and hard drive space than needed and the most advanced controllers EVER...but that would be a bad move because it would cost so much that nobody can afford one (sega used to have technologically better consoles back in the days...but the price caused people to go for a nintendo console).
So the question isn't so much as to whether it should or shouldn't have it, but if it NEEDS a large hard drive. I explained in my last post why I think it does, but let's be honest: DLC is pretty much exclusively something third parties want. I don't see nintendo adding downloadable levels to Super Mario games or DLC for Zelda. I'm sure they keep track of just how many people have filled their wii nand completely with too much wiiware/VC, and use those numbers for reference rather than forums where a vocal minority can easily outvoice the majority that has no issue whatsoever.
...and I think this forum has even less of a voting chance. I bet that on forums like this, at least 3 out of 4 complaints about a nand being too small is because the user has too many illegally downloaded wiiware on his machine.
Not really. Price is another factor. I've read swami's post, but the logic that works for a client doesn't really apply to a business model.
First up: a hard drive is an investment in EVERY console, not just the ones sold. And 50 bucks for a hard drive (PER MACHINE) may not sound like much, it will be added in the selling price. And if the price is too high, people will refrain from buying one. To put it to the extreme: I'm sure nintendo can put together a console that has all the latest CPU power, HD (or beyond) quality, way more memory and hard drive space than needed and the most advanced controllers EVER...but that would be a bad move because it would cost so much that nobody can afford one (sega used to have technologically better consoles back in the days...but the price caused people to go for a nintendo console).
So the question isn't so much as to whether it should or shouldn't have it, but if it NEEDS a large hard drive. I explained in my last post why I think it does, but let's be honest: DLC is pretty much exclusively something third parties want. I don't see nintendo adding downloadable levels to Super Mario games or DLC for Zelda. I'm sure they keep track of just how many people have filled their wii nand completely with too much wiiware/VC, and use those numbers for reference rather than forums where a vocal minority can easily outvoice the majority that has no issue whatsoever.
...and I think this forum has even less of a voting chance. I bet that on forums like this, at least 3 out of 4 complaints about a nand being too small is because the user has too many illegally downloaded wiiware on his machine.