Twitter has handed over user details for the first time ever!

Miss Panda

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
583
Trophies
1
XP
339
Country
QUOTE said:
Twitter has handed over the confidential details of British users in a landmark legal case.
For the first time, the American social networking site has bowed to a court action brought by a British group complaining that they were libelled in messages.
The individuals who brought the legal action were councillors and officials at a local authority, South Tyneside.
They launched the case in an attempt to unmask an anonymous whistle-blower who calls himself Mr Monkey.
The action is believed to have cost council tax payers hundreds of thousands of pounds.
The unprecedented ruling has prompted a row over freedom of speech, with experts warning that it may lead to a flood of actions by lawyers in other cases seeking to obtain personal information about people who breach super-injunctions or post libellous messages on Twitter.QUOTE“With Twitter quietly assisting in the process, the case could have an equally significant impact on future applications by those seeking to protect their privacy and reputation anywhere in the world, as a result of activity on Twitter.”
>snip<
Since 2008 Mr Monkey has levelled allegations against councillors ranging from ballot-rigging, drug-taking and fiddling expenses to a claim that one successfully ordered a public bus to turn around and pick him up from a pub late at night.
Since 2009 criticisms of the council have been made on Twitter, which the targets believe are linked to the earlier blogs.
The legal action to unmask the culprit was brought by three councillors and one senior official: Ian Malcolm, the council’s Labour leader, David Potts, former Conservative group leader who is now an independent, Anne Walsh, a Labour councillor, and Rick O’Farrell, head of enterprise and regeneration.
This feels like the end of an era. I thought the American constitution would protect people because of the whole freedom of speech thing. Not any more apparently. Because this judgement was made in a Californian court room. And this was paid for with tax payers money.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twit...Ryan-Giggs.html
 

Frogman

This could be you!
Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
765
Trophies
0
Age
28
Location
Aus
Website
www.frogmanreviews.com
XP
473
Country
AHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

HAHA...
haha...
hmmm
"Mr Monkey"
hahaha

ahhhh...

On topic: Is it really that big of a deal, people should know by now that anything you put on social networks can be used for or against you.
 

cwstjdenobs

Sodomy non sapiens
Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
1,756
Trophies
0
Location
Ankh-Morpork
Website
Visit site
XP
205
Country
yuyuyup said:
Why would the American constitution protect British citizens

You know if no one else is allowed to call US citizens Americans on this site without getting abuse from US citizens, you shouldn't be able to do it yourself.


But I think the question is more why should a US company fold to British laws.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: I make up songs all the time "The driver in front of me shouldn't be allowed to breathe" that...