We've just got a heated discussion that was moderated away as bickering - about this not possibly being the place where SX OS related service requests should be handled.
SX OS is not emulation or homebrew software - and it certainly isnt a "software project" either, that could be highlighted, in here for others to recognize.
I'm strongly against the notion - that people asking how to update what portion of their SX OS emunand should be part of a conversation thats held and supported in here.
Two arguments up front.
1. Even atmosphere or reinx related issues are discussed in a different subforum.
2. Being the most popular commercial CFW, drmed, closed source, trying to brick the devices of every researcher that dared to take a look at the actual software at one point - there is no way, that this fits with the culture and focus of this subforum.
(From a mentality standpoint SX OS are the folks that first lifted open source code against license agreements, and tried to bribe their way to have exclusivity on a major scene release, also against existing license agreements. But thats just flavor.)
If possible I'd need some form of public statement on what to do with purely SX OS related support threads, when they hit here. Should we report them to be moved, should we smile and treat them as "free and open software, that has to be supported by a community"? They dont release in here - they dont have their developers or support personal deal with issues in here...
There are many things that actually go against that notion.
Again - I'm only talking about SX OS service requests without being related to any of the programs in here. As in "I used the emunand option - whats my update path".
SX OS is not emulation or homebrew software - and it certainly isnt a "software project" either, that could be highlighted, in here for others to recognize.
I'm strongly against the notion - that people asking how to update what portion of their SX OS emunand should be part of a conversation thats held and supported in here.
Two arguments up front.
1. Even atmosphere or reinx related issues are discussed in a different subforum.
2. Being the most popular commercial CFW, drmed, closed source, trying to brick the devices of every researcher that dared to take a look at the actual software at one point - there is no way, that this fits with the culture and focus of this subforum.
(From a mentality standpoint SX OS are the folks that first lifted open source code against license agreements, and tried to bribe their way to have exclusivity on a major scene release, also against existing license agreements. But thats just flavor.)
If possible I'd need some form of public statement on what to do with purely SX OS related support threads, when they hit here. Should we report them to be moved, should we smile and treat them as "free and open software, that has to be supported by a community"? They dont release in here - they dont have their developers or support personal deal with issues in here...
There are many things that actually go against that notion.
Again - I'm only talking about SX OS service requests without being related to any of the programs in here. As in "I used the emunand option - whats my update path".
Last edited by notimp,