"Well God said himself he put in mankind a feeling giving them theres a GOD
All through the centuries people "worship" stars moon planets ETC everyone on earth is religious. God made us like that
You might be an atheist but there is something that you worship or believe! ALL humans on earth are religious"
First line. Much like you can not define a word using the word itself I do not think that plays.
People seeing patterns in things is a well documented concept in psychology. The classic example of this would be the Skinner box experiment where you can train animals (and people) to do things that have no bearing on the actual result because they "saw" a pattern.
Again I am not sure how you can make that assertion. Two things though -- biology has allowed for some considerable aberrations to happen, would it be possible for a person in your frame of logic to be born without it or is it beyond biology? Similarly atheism is generally defined as the lack of belief and if words want to be twisted then can we have a term to describe the lack of belief?
The others seem to be religious arguments for religious people. I suppose I could debate within that framework but I am not seeing the need other than to say there are those that would claim to believe and find your assertions to be completely false, others would agree. Such is the fun of things.
"You do realize unicorn isn't really a one horned horse its a extinct kind of rhino "
I saw the thing about the saola the other year (
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/1...e_asian_unicorn_snapped_in_vietnamese_forest/ ), a creature some hold to have inspired the Chinese equivalent of the unicorn, however I have not really seen anything of note for the unicorn to be an ancient*, presumably now extinct, creature.
*troublesome word that depending upon when things came into folklore.