Here are all of the references you are ignoringYou posted lies from media "fact checkers". The same fact checkers that said Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation among thousands and thousands of other lies. Nobody believes them anymore. It's very telling that you still do.
Who am I supposed to believe? Some random "fact checker" with an agenda or words straight from the horse's mouth? I already know what your preference is.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pre...ng-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...r-approval-distribution-will-be-main-n1249928
https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-r...d-evidence-confirms-high-effectiveness-pfizer
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.10...ly partially explained decreased transmission.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-909559662864
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7133e1.htm
The reason these are important is that the expand upon what she said and give a wider context to what's missing from her testimony. Of course, since you didn't read any of this, you are choosing to remain ignorant on the topic. Simply put, you aren't making things better for your case, you are only proving the very point you are trying to argue again. That point is, Conservatives don't look deeper into topics and aren't very deep thinkers.