I am talking about the definition of words and how they are used. I haven't been responding to you since you first said something because it seemed like that you weren't even trying to see the points I was making.
First point, and
@Lacius knows this; things like affidavits, and people willing to testify, were considered "evidence" for all of our lives, up until last year. So the underlying definition of "evidence" has clearly been changed to fit a dishonest narrative..
Second point, the Hebrew word for the Judeo-Christian "soul" is "naphesh" which is closer to meaning "living being" than the "popular" fantasy pseudo-definition of "eternal afterlife vehicle". Of course, with the
current standard of "evidence" that has been recently adopted, there is no evidence that you or
@Lacius exist. There is more that could be debated about the fate of the soul and so on, but the initial issue I brought up were that people BS'ing their way through a discussion and it turned out that they didn't like to be called out on it.