On that you're correct. I don't know what zerohedge.com is, but without even clicking on it I know it's not a real source of news or information. Just as likely it's an alt-right source to muddy the waters with.
Riiight. So 4chan is reliable but no press source or intelligence source is. This is why I'm glad I'm glad schools are starting to teach journalistic literacy.
So basically what you're telling me is that it's fine to disregard sources entirely based on nonsensical assumptions, which are based entirely upon the article in question disagreeing with you, and then are inversely insulting me for "taking something at face value" (despite the posts in question predating this ordeal) because I question the authenticity of a "dossier" by an anonymous """"source"""" that says ridiculous nonsense like Trump hired hookers to watch hentai with him, to piss on beds, and to call him a big guy while quoting the Dark Knight Rises, and that when even the liberal-as-fuck sites that spew this nonsense say that the dossier itself is about 70% factual, that must somehow mean anything questioning it is wrong?
Anything that agrees with you is suddenly infallible like it's a fucking religion but the moment an article even dares to question your cult mentality, it's only doing so because it's alt right and "muddying the waters." To me, mate, it sounds like you're obsessed with trump, and are desperate for some weak excuse to shit on the guy. You can find a myriad of things to complain about -- like how the new Tax Reform fucks the middle class, giving Jeff Sessions any sort of authority, and more -- but instead, you focus on a dossier filled with stupid shit, informed by a bunch of NEETs (like yourself probably) and preach it like it's some religious figure's divine word, refusing to hear anything even *questioning it.*
Going on your nonsensical logic, it's perfectly fine to disregard the liberal media sites -- anything owned by Gawker, Buzzfeed, and so on -- because they're muddying the waters in the debate based upon the suggestion Russia hacked the election, even though the most they probably did was get dirt on Hillary, which still didn't work since she still won the popular vote.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
This kind of ignorant retardation is why politics shouldn't be discussed outside a closed area. I'm all for good debate, but if this is the kind of garbage that's allowed to be spoken, there's no point.
It's easy to take everything at face value.. Much like Xzi does every time there's a chance to be anti trump. Clearly nothing has been proven.. As even mentioned by the OP. Speculation is great, no?
Nail on the head. Glad I'm not the only one seeing this. Literally anything anti trump, no matter how inane, or clearly fake as fuck it is, Xzi hops on that shit. Yeesh. Politics really should just be banned here along with everyone who discusses it.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Also, the intelligence officer is
ex-MI6, not currently MI6. I don't know about you but if I didn't represent some intelligence agency and I really disliked a guy, and I knew gullible dipshits would obey my nonsense, I'd totally "leak" stupid shit from my "anonymous sources" just to watch what happens.