Nintendo NX is a portable console with detachable controllers (Eurogamer)

nintendo-logo-620x349.png

Eurogamer are reporting that Nintendo's upcoming NX will be a portable, handheld console with detachable controllers:

On the move, NX will function as a high-powered handheld console with its own display. So far so normal - but here's the twist: we've heard the screen is bookended by two controller sections on either side, which can be attached or detached as required.
Then, when you get home, the system can connect to your TV for gaming on the big screen.
A base unit, or dock station, is used to connect the brain of the NX - within the controller - to display on your TV.

nx-is-a-portable-console-with-detachable-controllers-146954365832.png

:arrow:Read the full article with a lot more info here: Source
 

dronesplitter

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
595
Trophies
0
XP
421
Country
United States
From what the rumors are suggesting, it's aiming for handheld power and won't be priced to turn off those people, maybe. That might not be true, though, just have to see what it's priced at and what true power it has when it releases. Basically, saying it's a console is kind of a joke to me. It's a handheld (using a better chip from nvidia) with tv out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TotalInsanity4

Vishnoo

Failure is success if we learn from it.
Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
261
Trophies
0
XP
146
Country
India
welp i won't be getting an NX
guess i'll be getting Zelda on wiiu than but it will prob be the last game i ever get from them. they are dead to me now :sleep:
Then what about this game: Darksiders: Warmastered(Wii u,Xbox One,PS4,PC)
 

TotalInsanity4

GBAtemp Supreme Overlord
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
10,800
Trophies
0
Location
Under a rock
XP
9,814
Country
United States
The true question is should I buy a new 3ds or should I wait for the nx hoping it would have backwards compatibility with 3ds games?
I somehow doubt it will, but I guess if you want to hold out until the later end of this year for an official statement from Nintendo, feel free
 
  • Like
Reactions: KarlslandOtaku

KarlslandOtaku

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
58
Trophies
1
Age
31
XP
1,141
Country
United States
I love this design! ^_^
Then again I prefer portables anyway.
@gbaboy123 I remember Nintendo saying at one point that the NX will be a standalone system that won't replace either the 3ds/n3ds or Wii U. Although the Nintendo DS was supposed to fit the same ticket for the GBA & GameCube; so we will have to wait & see if history repeats itself again. ;)
 

TheRealDude

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
15
Trophies
0
XP
192
Country
United States
From what I see of the article, all they keep saying is that "Sources Say". This in itself is a problem. It could be a Nintendo Side Project, but not the NX itself. There is so much speculation and Nintendo has said absolutely nothing about it. They've been very secretive about the whole thing, so I doubt that these "sources" would have any plausible information, just speculation.
 

TotalInsanity4

GBAtemp Supreme Overlord
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
10,800
Trophies
0
Location
Under a rock
XP
9,814
Country
United States
From what I see of the article, all they keep saying is that "Sources Say". This in itself is a problem. It could be a Nintendo Side Project, but not the NX itself. There is so much speculation and Nintendo has said absolutely nothing about it. They've been very secretive about the whole thing, so I doubt that these "sources" would have any plausible information, just speculation.
And on top of that, the sketch is an interpretive drawing based on what "the sources" told them
 

gbaboy123

Banned!
Banned
Joined
May 14, 2011
Messages
412
Trophies
0
Location
tree with wi fi
XP
331
Country
United States
once people see the new Zelda running on that handheld x console device plus all the new games that we don't know yet plus a good library of vc games plus third party support a.k.a the new sonic games and the dragon quest game I bet everyone is going to want to buy one plus I hope we get 3ds backwards compatibility
 
  • Like
Reactions: TotalInsanity4

WhiteMaze

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
1,085
Trophies
2
Age
32
XP
2,211
Country
Portugal
they have to go to the common denominator and thats stupid mobile. If mobile had proper button layout id be all for it but touch just doesnt work for most games..

Touch has been proven to not work for any "real" game. That is why gamepads were invented.

The problem, when we are talking about handhelds, is one problem alone:

Smartphones.

No casual gamer wants to pay to buy a dedicated gaming handheld, when your smartphone does gaming, calls, media, work, and so much more. The absolute and final proof to this, was the massive reception Pokemon Go had. Because now, Nintendo has both markets: The true gamers, and the casuals who never bothered to "waste" money on a console, but still like and remember Pokemon.

A handheld gaming system such as the Vita or the 3DS, is optional and limited in its functions. Very limited. On the other hand, a smartphone is not only something you need, but it also runs circles around the 3DS and Vita in regards to functionality.

Hence why Nintendo will probably adopt the Android system.

At the end of the day, both Nintendo and Sony have to adopt iOS / Android and make games for those OS's. Making specific gaming systems has long lost it's "profitableness", simply because no one wants to carry around a Nintendo 3DS when they can have Pokemon Moon/Sun and Zelda on their phone.

Nintendo and Sony will try to fight this with every ounce of strength they have. But in the end, they both will become Software publishers, rather than hardware makers. Mark my words.

Portable gaming consoles were beaten the second they invented smartphones and tablets.

There is one final reason people do not usually point out, as to why handhelds are a losing battle, that to me is very obvious:

Whether we like it or not, someone playing a Nintendo 3DS on the street, will be seen as a nerd/child-like person by the masses. This is a problem that remains in many countries, mine included.

Playing on a SMARTPHONE, isn't. Everyone plays on their smartphones.
 
Last edited by WhiteMaze,
  • Like
Reactions: kabloomz and Roxe__

Roxe__

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2016
Messages
150
Trophies
0
XP
316
Country
Argentina
Touch has been proven to not work for any "real" game. That is why gamepads were invented.

The problem, when we are talking about handhelds, is one problem alone:

Smartphones.

No casual gamer wants to pay to buy a dedicated gaming handheld, when your smartphone does gaming, calls, media, work, and so much more. The absolute and final proof to this, was the massive reception Pokemon Go had. Because now, Nintendo has both markets: The true gamers, and the casuals who never bothered to "waste" money on a console, but still like and remember Pokemon.

A handheld gaming system such as the Vita or the 3DS, is optional and limited in its functions. Very limited. On the other hand, a smartphone is not only something you need, but it also runs circles around the 3DS and Vita in regards to functionality.

Hence why Nintendo will probably adopt the Android system.

At the end of the day, both Nintendo and Sony have to adopt iOS / Android and make games for those OS's. Making specific gaming systems has long lost it's "profitableness", simply because no one wants to carry around a Nintendo 3DS when they can have Pokemon Moon/Sun and Zelda on their phone.

Nintendo and Sony will try to fight this with every ounce of strength they have. But in the end, they both will become Software publishers, rather than hardware makers. Mark my words.

Portable gaming consoles were beaten the second they invented smartphones and tablets.

There is one final reason people do not usually point out, as to why handhelds are a losing battle, that to me is very obvious:

Whether we like it or not, someone playing a Nintendo 3DS on the street, will be seen as a nerd/child-like person by the masses. This is a problem that remains in many countries, mine included.

Playing on a SMARTPHONE, isn't. Everyone plays on their smartphones.

True words, honest facts!

At the end of the day people just want simplicity, and it logically makes sense to combine the 2 together, we have the hardware power and software knowledge. The funny thing is that this doesn't just apply to smartphones/handhelds, it also applies to gaming consoles and PCs. When you step back and look at the facts, such as how games are developed and tested on PCs, it really hits you. I mean why buy a gaming console which would usually have a dumbed down version of the game (whether it's graphics or computing power) when you can play the game the way it was originally developed, on a PC? I used to play everything on console, then one day my friend showed a comparison picture of the graphical difference for Skyrim PS3vsPC, and i was dumbfounded and if that wasn't enough he later showed me the MODS for the game, my jaw dropped. I ended up building my PC the next month, it wasn't hard, nor was it expensive, it was a mediocre build at best but still looked better than the PS3. I later saved up for a good graphics card and by the time the PS4 was out, i was like on PS6 in terms of raw power. Take a look at the Xbox S (Scorpio project), they mentioned it having 6 teraflops of processing power, my 4 year old graphics card has 5, so put that in perspective.
When you sit and really think about it, the big companies like Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo make their profit from selling consumers old hardware so you can play their "exclusives" on them. But if we as consumers stopped feeding them our money, those 3 companies would step out of the hardware scene real quick and switch over to the software aspect of the gaming industry. I also cannot believe that they're making people pay monthly/trimonthly JUST TO PLAY MULTIPLAYER ONLINE...and people are falling for it, l:wtf:l. Not to mention that "cross-platform" wouldn't need to be a thing, or the fact that our money would actually REACH the developers since there isn't a middle man, which would mean more games from the developers.....but hey what do I know, let's continue to feed the giants.

Money maker for... Who?

Just because your coworker has a microtraction addiction problem doesn't mean that most people do. In fact, free-to-play games get 90% of their profit from "whales" like your coworker who spend obscene amounts of money for something of little value. Most gamers will spend little to no money in a free game. And the game becomes unpopular really fast. Remember Candy Crush? Nobody's playing that shit anymore. The two biggest free-to-play companies (King and someone else) are not doing so hot themselves.

Manufacturers are fighting tooth and nail against each other, with Samsung being the only one that is making any notable profit.
Game developers only make profit on free-to-play games, and even then they are fighting to keep people interested in their games. Games that cost more than even $5 are pretty much dead.
So despite Nintendo not making any profit on hardware nor making any profit on games, Android is a "money maker." riiight.

And that's aside from the fact that the result would be a monstrosity which will be complete garbage after two years. It will have obsolete hardware in one year, online gaming would be a hacking nightmare in six months, and Nintendo will lose control of the platform in one month. How's the Oyua doing? Attaching a name brand to it would not solve it's problems.

Back to the smartphone gaming.
For those who are doubting iOS/Android as money makers for games, here's a poll of a F2P game called Kingdom Hearts Unchained that I've been playing recently on my phone. The poll shows how much money people have dumped into the game, i took the low average sum and came out with $69k, FROM ONLY the 680 people that voted. This doesn't include the people in the other parts of the world, nor the 1 million people that downloaded this game. The game's objective is super simple with "luck" as a big factor of the game, and graphics consists of a CG crappy drawn backgrounds with 2D figures that have minor/simple animations, oh and there's also a "story". If you take the $69 and divide it by the people that voted (680), you get $101.5, so it's like 680 people paid $101.50 for their copy of the game.....So please check your facts before stating that Android/iOS is not a money maker for games. Does the game make it's money from shitty 'micro-transactions' that most of us hate, YES 100%, am I suggesting/condoning that our future gaming should be mobile with micro-transactions on games like as LoZ or Super Mario, HELL NO, I would puke. But when you look at KHUx there's no way to hack it and play for free, everything is saved on their servers. So maybe we can take that idea and have Nintendo servers check our legitimacy of our copy of the game, and if we check out fine, we'd be able to save our games (like on our Mii or something).
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiteMaze
S

Saiyan Lusitano

Guest
I like the idea of being a portable console but I'll wait and see what Nintendo confirms it to be.
 

TotalInsanity4

GBAtemp Supreme Overlord
Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
10,800
Trophies
0
Location
Under a rock
XP
9,814
Country
United States
Touch has been proven to not work for any "real" game. That is why gamepads were invented.

The problem, when we are talking about handhelds, is one problem alone:

Smartphones.

No casual gamer wants to pay to buy a dedicated gaming handheld, when your smartphone does gaming, calls, media, work, and so much more. The absolute and final proof to this, was the massive reception Pokemon Go had. Because now, Nintendo has both markets: The true gamers, and the casuals who never bothered to "waste" money on a console, but still like and remember Pokemon.

A handheld gaming system such as the Vita or the 3DS, is optional and limited in its functions. Very limited. On the other hand, a smartphone is not only something you need, but it also runs circles around the 3DS and Vita in regards to functionality.

Hence why Nintendo will probably adopt the Android system.

At the end of the day, both Nintendo and Sony have to adopt iOS / Android and make games for those OS's. Making specific gaming systems has long lost it's "profitableness", simply because no one wants to carry around a Nintendo 3DS when they can have Pokemon Moon/Sun and Zelda on their phone.

Nintendo and Sony will try to fight this with every ounce of strength they have. But in the end, they both will become Software publishers, rather than hardware makers. Mark my words.

Portable gaming consoles were beaten the second they invented smartphones and tablets.

There is one final reason people do not usually point out, as to why handhelds are a losing battle, that to me is very obvious:

Whether we like it or not, someone playing a Nintendo 3DS on the street, will be seen as a nerd/child-like person by the masses. This is a problem that remains in many countries, mine included.

Playing on a SMARTPHONE, isn't. Everyone plays on their smartphones.
Were there no real games on the DS/3DS/Wii U? Or are you referring to touch-only controls?
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    Sonic Angel Knight @ Sonic Angel Knight: :ninja: