pardon my English but, is you're tread pic aroused?the can get away with it if they have them speak only in hylian and having subs lol
The CD-i games weren't even made by Nintendo.The separation with Link is already inherent in the games, with the 3rd Person Perspective and everything. I think it would be better if they stopped straddling the line between making him a character and making him a complete blank slate and just developed him in the next game.
Voice Acting could be a start, but if it's in (essentially) Simlish, I doubt it will immerse people any more. Besides, remember the last time when they gave voice acting a try with the Zelda franchise? And the time before that?
pardon my English but, is you're tread pic aroused?the can get away with it if they have them speak only in hylian and having subs lol
The rest of the quote: "[...] but then I didn't count the fact that Nintendo doesn't consider those games as being part of the series."[...](though the fact that Nintendo allowed three of those games, plus Hotel Mario, to be developed is bad enough)[...]The CD-i games weren't even made by Nintendo.The separation with Link is already inherent in the games, with the 3rd Person Perspective and everything. I think it would be better if they stopped straddling the line between making him a character and making him a complete blank slate and just developed him in the next game.
Voice Acting could be a start, but if it's in (essentially) Simlish, I doubt it will immerse people any more. Besides, remember the last time when they gave voice acting a try with the Zelda franchise? And the time before that?
The rest of the quote: "[...] but then I didn't count the fact that Nintendo doesn't consider those games as being part of the series."[...](though the fact that Nintendo allowed three of those games, plus Hotel Mario, to be developed is bad enough)[...]The CD-i games weren't even made by Nintendo.The separation with Link is already inherent in the games, with the 3rd Person Perspective and everything. I think it would be better if they stopped straddling the line between making him a character and making him a complete blank slate and just developed him in the next game.
Voice Acting could be a start, but if it's in (essentially) Simlish, I doubt it will immerse people any more. Besides, remember the last time when they gave voice acting a try with the Zelda franchise? And the time before that?
Nintendo gave the developers the right to make three (crappy) games with Legend of Zelda elements. That doesn't mean Nintendo sucks at voice acting, since they weren't the ones who made it.
This argument is irrelevant.The rest of the quote: "[...] but then I didn't count the fact that Nintendo doesn't consider those games as being part of the series."[...](though the fact that Nintendo allowed three of those games, plus Hotel Mario, to be developed is bad enough)[...]The CD-i games weren't even made by Nintendo.The separation with Link is already inherent in the games, with the 3rd Person Perspective and everything. I think it would be better if they stopped straddling the line between making him a character and making him a complete blank slate and just developed him in the next game.
Voice Acting could be a start, but if it's in (essentially) Simlish, I doubt it will immerse people any more. Besides, remember the last time when they gave voice acting a try with the Zelda franchise? And the time before that?
Nintendo gave the developers the right to make three (crappy) games with Legend of Zelda elements. That doesn't mean Nintendo sucks at voice acting, since they weren't the ones who made it.
I never said Nintendo sucks at voice acting either, just that there is a precedent for voice acting going horribly, horribly wrong with the Zelda franchise (Which the CD-i games are still a part of, mind you).
My favourite (Skyward Sword) is the man in that flying shop saying thank you. Literally crying.Zelda had voice acting since the N64.
"HA! HYAH!"
"HEY, LISTEN!"