Gaming Yup Stupid Nat Type

kevan

Imagination rules the world
OP
Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2009
Messages
1,378
Trophies
0
Age
30
Location
Place
Website
Visit site
XP
506
Country
Need to change my Nat type from strict to open.
My router is a Thomson TG782T and it is both my
router and modem supplied by the isp, so getting a
new router is not an option. I neeed to as far as i under stand
change this

DHCP Pools
DHCP Pool Name
LAN_private 10.0.0.1 - 10.0.0.254
Address Range Gateway
10.0.0.138

I need to change the LAN_private tp 10.0.0.100 - 10.0.0254
I can't work out how though.
 

FAST6191

Techromancer
Editorial Team
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
36,795
Trophies
5
XP
28,518
Country
United Kingdom
This has a good chance of getting technical, I apologise in advance but there is no real way around that. The last paragraphs should have "simple" solutions but do read the rest as it might help sort things in your head.

You usually can get another router- you might just have to enter data into that where you would not the original (some ISPs do not need that though). Picking a random provider for this example you usually just have to find their FAQ page and add stuff like http://www.draytek.com.au/faq/WAN/adsl.htm#ADSL_settings
Even if that is not possible then you can always add another router/switch/hub onto the existing setup- most people with cable modems end up doing this.

Secondly many ISP supplied routers come with their own firmware (there is a whole bunch of people who like to hack these to do many things) and looking around it seems this one comes fairly locked down.

Also you seem to be confusing two things

IPv4 as part of the spec has a few IP ranges that are not used on the public internet ( http://www.inetdaemon.com/tutorials/intern...addresses.shtml )- a secondary protocol called DCHP can be used to assign addresses to devices on a network without them having to ask for their own special ones (and you having to sort it out which is nice if you do not want to spend 5 hours configuring a big network and keeping things up to date)- this using "special" ones is known as using a static IP address.
The latter part of what you just described is mainly for people that want to run servers or handsets for voip on the network and need to forward static IP addresses to the devices without the chances of a collision with something the DCHP protocol assigns (DCHP can be told to only give out addresses in a certain range leaving others unused/free).

NAT is a method by which one IP address (you router and depending on your ISP maybe a few things there as well) can be used to serve multiple devices- you change the port numbers and as the port changed to is known the data goes where it is needed and that can mess up some protocols or implementations of them (xbox live often providing a good example of this).
What you actually want to do here is either set up port forwarding, tweak firewall rules (your router often has a basic firewall built in) or more likely set up a network DMZ (demilitarized zone). The only reason for restricting the DCHP pool here is as part of security setups (if you have just set up port forwarding you can make it only go to devices that know about it- those that just snatch up DCHP addresses like junk virus ridden laptops and phones that randomly connect then have less chance of compromising network security or vice versa you can tell certain ranges that they can not use the internet just the internal network- big companies can use more exotic versions of this to restrict things by department).

Short version- if it does not work out of the box then you have three options
1) Port forwarding. Go into the network settings of the 360 and tell it to use a static IP address (you can stick it in the DCHP range if you want- just pick a higher number as it is unlikely your home network will ever be rocking 90 devices at the same time), next go the router and choose port forwarding and point it at your 360.
More modern routers and network setups can tie a device (usually a mac address) to rules and forwarding saving you having to mess with an IP address but the ISP supplied garbage rarely has such niceties.

2) Set up a DMZ- this is mainly an open access portion of the network the router will say nothing about and allow to carry on regardless (give or take some other options/overrides). Make sure the live protocols and port ranges are

3) Check your firewall is not blocking Live. Similar to the DMZ the firewall may be configured to only allow certain traffic out of the network. Many devices will already have live plugged in.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    What's Vizio?
  • K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2:
    A TV
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    newsroom-intel-arc-b580-3:1920-1080

    It's honestly a good looking graphics card
  • Xdqwerty @ Xdqwerty:
    Good night
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    @Xdqwerty Have qwertyuiop dreams
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    oh my fucking god I just had a 3d print fail, while printing the most expensive filament I've ever printed
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    It's PLA filament from ProtoPasta with copper metal particulate mixed into the plastic blend. It's $100/kg, and my failed print is 149g of it. :cry:

    :gun:
  • chrisrlink @ chrisrlink:
    supprised it took THIS LONG for intel to start making dGPU's
    +1
  • chrisrlink @ chrisrlink:
    i wonder who'll wini the price war now with intel in the fray
  • chrisrlink @ chrisrlink:
    then again they always say "Three's a crowd"
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    @chrisrlink, does anyone really care though? Intel has never really been known for graphics performance, aside from the amazing transcode capabilities of Intel Quicksync. I can't see PC gamers for example moving over to Intel any time remotely soon since Intel hasn't established a position yet in the higher end gaming GPU market
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    More options is never a bad thing, of course. I just don't think it's going to cause any meaningful disruption to the stranglehold that Nvidia and AMD have
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    At least not for quite a few years
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    @Sicklyboy They do look like really good cards though. They have insane value (Not A-series value but still more than the 7600)
    +1
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    @Sicklyboy I hope the b580 b570 are good so that gpu manufacturers will lower the markup
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Admittedly I haven't seen any specs/reviews yet so I'm not sure how any of it stacks up
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Guess I'll have to watch the Gamers Nexus video later! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1fEpWy9B0c
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    @Sicklyboy it hasn't released yet so we don't have review but here are intel provided benchmarks:

    OBWos0h.png
    +1
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    The data is a little bit weird. I would take this with a grain of salt that you could choke on
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    I thought that said 10x (10 TIMES) faster than a 4060 lmaoooo
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    I was like yeah, OK.
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    I'm definitely interested to see how that pans out. Like I said, more options is never a bad thing. I mean, bad for intel maybe if it totally flops. But for real, hopefully it works well and there's more competition in the gaming GPU space.
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    @Sicklyboy The first one says %36 faster than the 4060 but I think the second one is right since the first one I screenshotted from a yt video
    +1
  • kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042:
    Anyways, I'm excited for dec 12 when it launches so I can see the benchmarks and reviews
    +1
    kijetesantakalu042 @ kijetesantakalu042: Anyways, I'm excited for dec 12 when it launches so I can see the benchmarks and reviews +1