Hacking WiiU Permanent Firmware Spoof help

handy333

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
122
Trophies
0
Age
32
Location
Over in Wonderlust
Website
projectrisingsun.weebly.com
XP
265
Country
United States
I want to permanent spoof but will it be like I'm on the latest firmware and some of the 5.3.2 homebrew won't work?
Or will I actually be on 5.3.2 but the system thinks I'm on the latest update?

I like 5.3.2, most things work. I just wanted to try something not really worth messing anything up just to test this thing I'm trying to test.

I would use the non-permanent version but it never seems to work and I only think it's just for the eshop to get online.
 

link270

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
130
Trophies
0
XP
376
Country
United States
If you do the spoof then your system will only think that it's on 5.5.1, when in reality all the internal stuff is still 5.3.2. I have done it and haven't had any problems, it scared me for a bit because I couldn't get the exploit to run, but after a few tries everything worked out just fine.

After the spoof in your system settings it will say it's on 5.5.1, but the inside is still 5.3.2 ;)
 

Kakkoii

Old fart
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
631
Trophies
0
XP
586
Country
Canada
So none of the latest update features are present.
Like if I was to have a game required to use this certain feature I could play it?
Yes, if there was a special feature that is only present in a newer update, and a game needed that feature, then you would not be able to use that feature in the game. The only thing the spoof does is prevent version checks from seeing that you're on an older firmware (except for EShop, there's a temporary patch you have to run to use that).

So far there have been no new features that do that though, so it's fine. And you can always update fully if you ever feel like it.

The main purpose is allowing you to use another trick to get into the eshop.
And to prevent update nags like when you try to launch a game especially. I'd say that's the bigger reason than eshop.
 

Obveron

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
504
Trophies
1
XP
1,407
Country
Canada
And you can always update fully if you ever feel like it.

Very confused by this statement. I thought the spoof was permanent, never unable to undo. In other words if we spoof we can't ever return to virgin 5.3.2 and run an official update.

I've been sitting on unmodded 5.3.2, waiting for the day we get a reversible way to emulate the latest firmware (with online play and eshop) while still keeping the 5.3.2 exploit alive for homebrew.
So far, the spoof technique seems to offer everything I want except the "reversible" part. But you say there remains an option to fully update?
 
Last edited by Obveron,

Kakkoii

Old fart
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
631
Trophies
0
XP
586
Country
Canada
Very confused by this statement. I thought the spoof was permanent, never unable to undo. In other words if we spoof we can't ever return to virgin 5.3.2 and run an official update.

I've been sitting on unmodded 5.3.2, waiting for the day we get a reversible way to emulate the latest firmware (with online play and eshop) while still keeping the 5.3.2 exploit alive for homebrew.
So far, the spoof technique seems to offer everything I want except the "reversible" part. But you say there remains an option to fully update?
000500101000400A is the system firmware, you can download it with nusgrabber. It comes with a .tik file, which means you can install it with WUPinstaller.

But also, why would you ever need to revert the spoof? If you ever wanted to sell the console, you'd just do a system format, there's no other reason you could possibly need to undo the spoof.
 

Obveron

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
504
Trophies
1
XP
1,407
Country
Canada
Are you saying a system format or manual firmware install could eliminate signs the spoof ever existed and leave me with a fully functional un-modded wii-u?

The reason I've steered away from sppofing is because I've read, in very clear terms, the spoof is permanent and cannot be reversed. I've inferred from that, if the mod ever became a problem to play new games online or access the store, that theres a good chance I could not completely reverse the mod, not completely return to stock, not completely use official updates.
 

Obveron

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
504
Trophies
1
XP
1,407
Country
Canada
000500101000400A is the system firmware, you can download it with nusgrabber. It comes with a .tik file, which means you can install it with WUPinstaller.

But also, why would you ever need to revert the spoof? If you ever wanted to sell the console, you'd just do a system format, there's no other reason you could possibly need to undo the spoof.
The more research I do, the more I confirm that the spoof cannot be erased by system format.
I stated my reasons for wanting the undo above, it has nothing to do with selling the console.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatih120

Kakkoii

Old fart
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2007
Messages
631
Trophies
0
XP
586
Country
Canada
Are you saying a system format or manual firmware install could eliminate signs the spoof ever existed and leave me with a fully functional un-modded wii-u?

The reason I've steered away from sppofing is because I've read, in very clear terms, the spoof is permanent and cannot be reversed. I've inferred from that, if the mod ever became a problem to play new games online or access the store, that theres a good chance I could not completely reverse the mod, not completely return to stock, not completely use official updates.
I told you that you CAN update your whole system by using WUPinstaller...
Also, when a new update comes out, your version.bin will state an older version, and thus the system will allow you to update the normal way as well.

The version spoof isn't a "mod" in the traditional sense. All it is, is that you've installed a newer version of the version.bin file, there is no actual modification, all your system files are still official, one of your files is simply at a newer state.

So, if a game ever comes out that needs actual new core functions from a new update, you can, as I said, install that update using WUPinstaller in the situation that your version.bin is already on the latest so you couldn't update normally. Otherwise you would just update normally.

So again, there is absolutely no reason you would need to downgrade your version.bin.
 
Last edited by Kakkoii,
  • Like
Reactions: midniteNinja

Obveron

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2010
Messages
504
Trophies
1
XP
1,407
Country
Canada
Thank you kakkoii, I didn't understand that the spoof doesn't prevent official updates if one were to choose to abandon the exploitable kernel and go "legit". It's unusual that the spoof has been described as permanent, when really it is non-downgradable, there is a big difference between those terms.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    the vram is one advantage when it comes to AI but ends up being slower even with that and really AI is the only use case that needs more than 12gb vram right now
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Interesting lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I think I watched a video where two games at 4K where eating just over 16GB of RAM and it's the one case where the 7900XT and XTX pulled ahead (minus RTX of course)
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    So my opinion is that they could age a bit better in the future, and maybe AMD will continue improving them via drivers like they tend to do. No guarantee there but they have done it in the past. Just a feeling I have.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    cyberpunk at 4k without DLSS/fidelityfx *might* exceed 12gb
    +1
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    but that game barely runs at native 4k
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I think it was some newer games and probably poorly optimized PS4 or PS5 ports
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    they definitely will age better but i feel dlss might outweigh that since it looks about as good as native resolution and much less demanding
    +1
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    When I played Cyberpunk on my old 2080 Ti it sucked lol
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    AMD could introduce something comparable to DLSS but nvidia's got a lot more experience with that
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    least amd 7xxx has tensor cores which the previous generations didn't so there is the potential for AI upscaling
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    They have FSR or whatever it's called and yeah it's still not great
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    so AMD seem to finally be starting to take AI seriously
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Oh yeah those new 8000 CPUs have AI cores built in that's interesting
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Maybe they plan on offloading to the CPU?
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Would be kinda cool to have the CPU and GPU working in random more
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Tandem even
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i think i heard of that, it's a good idea, shouldn't need a dedicated GPU just to run a LLM or video upscaling
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    even the nvidia shield tv has AI video upscaling
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    LLMs can be run on cpu anyway but it's quite slow
  • BakerMan @ BakerMan:
    Have you ever been beaten by a wet spaghetti noodle by your girlfriend because she has a twin sister, and you got confused and fucked her dad?
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I had a girlfriend who had a twin sister and they would mess with me constantly.... Until one chipped a tooth then finally I could tell them apart.... Lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    They would have the same hair style the same clothes everything... Really messed with my head lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    @The Real Jdbye, I could see AMD trying to pull off the CPU GPU tandem thing, would be a way to maybe close the gap a bit with Nvidia. Plus it would kinda put Nvidia at a future disadvantage since Nvidia can't make X86/64 CPUs? Intel and AMD licensing issues... I wonder how much that has held back innovation.
    Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo: @The Real Jdbye, I could see AMD trying to pull off the CPU GPU tandem thing, would be a way to...