Well considering in all likelihood it would be Clinton vs Guiliani I went with the Republican (if you can call em that considering things...which is good.)
I find Clinton, what she stands for, and how she wants to transform this nation a frightening thing. I have zero interest in a eastern european socialist democracy type nation what so ever. Oh and by the way if you look at her actions, not listen to her spin Clinton there has a very similar train of thought, record, and stance on things as old GW. So really, if you do want more of the same as far as outside of social programs go...have fun. She's like a homeland socialist version of GW on the national/int'l level. And I for one hope we don't get universal healthcare as it's not my goddamn job to pay more out of my biweekly paychecks to someone who can't afford it...I'm very against handouts except for the temporary kind when someone in true need really needs it (ie: unemployment which dries up in 6mo.) The reason our healthcare system sucks ass is not to be solved by having the gov't pay for it (ie: US) the issue at hand is greed of the doctors, hospitals, and equipment makers/suppliers. There truly is no need to have a hospital charge someone for a weekend stay around $30000 or more depending how f'd up you are. An ambulence drive to the emergency room shouldn't cost a $1000 either. The problem is greed across the board, and solving it should not be the gov't just making everyone pay those greedy fucks what they want. I hate gov't regulation and all that, but they need to clamp down on the source of the problem, not the taxpayer to feed into it. This is exactly why those who really can afford it (much like that news piece this week of dentistry in Britain) will fly to a place like India or Egypt to get superior care for a 1/4 the cost as they don't fucking rip you off with jacked up prices...you pay what it is really costing!
