Which is Worse?!

ReBirFh

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
63
Trophies
0
XP
213
Country
Brazil
I'd argue that unless you're a blind fan most CD's will have only a few tracks that is really good or you hear the most. A DVD that skip scenes be they good or not is worthless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbcrazed

Shinigami357

Current "give a fuck" level: Honey Badger
Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
1,647
Trophies
0
Age
32
Website
Visit site
XP
280
Country
You know, if you listen to a CD enough times without prejudging each song, some of them might actually grow on you. It's not just the [carrier] singles/popular songs/songs that have immediate impact that are the good songs. On the other hand, a DVD that just skips its way through the movie [or whatever] is plain damaged goods [or is just plain bad].
 

Eerpow

*swoosh*
Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
2,069
Trophies
0
Age
31
Location
ERROR!
XP
1,200
Country
What's worse: Spilling milk on your shirt forcing you to go change it or pouring a bowl of cereal only to realize you haven't got any milk left?
 

Alexrose

Untitled
Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
783
Trophies
0
Age
32
Location
England
XP
374
Country
I don't get why people are talking about how the CD with 3 songs might have the good songs on them. Absolutely irrelevant. We've been told the CD has 3 songs, not the CD has the "best" songs. If two thirds of the artist's tracks are bad on a 9 track album and you only get 3 songs, the expectation is that you'll get 1 good song and 2 bad ones, not 3 good ones.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: Hello @realtimesave.