Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The Edge of the Forum' started by Flame, Nov 22, 2011.
for me its number 2.
SURPRISE! THEY'RE ALL TRANSGENDER!!!
I know this is EoF and all, but really?
Well, I guess I can post the same thread with nothing but sexy looking anthropomorphic male furry characters, right?
So I'm guessing I can then? All of those sexy male anthro-furry characters in sexy positions and/or barely any clothing, all like those "chicks"?
Because frankly, this thread is about as disturbing to me as an anti-furry would find that.
Why should this be allowed while the other isn't? Get my point?
So really, I answered my own question, either both can be or neither can be. This one's still here, despite you have the power to lock/delete it, so I'm going with they're both ok.
16 and 20, leaning more towards 20.
no they not, their are perfectly normal woman.
I prefer these chicks.
Why do you keep trying to shut down threads?.... (If serious)
I thought it was going be that chick joke again when there are actually chicks.
Me? I wasn't, I've been wanting to post skantily clad male furry character's for a while now in a thread, now I have an excuse to. This thread needs to stay open for my excuse to be valid
You have to show restraint since this isn't really that bad.
oh and fixed.
I'll say it again, slowly this time......
You could do that.
Or you could get off of your pedestal for once instead.
Warning: Spoilers inside!
um... I meant your future thread...
A mix of 1 and 3. Because that is what Maddy is. Not to mention 1 has a similar hair colour to Maddy.
But I'm naked (as seen in my avi/siggie). If I'm standing on a pedistal, wouldn't you enjoy the view better? I'd think you'd want me to stay on it
Photoshop 2, 11 and 4 together and you've basically got my girlfriend
i find this thread offensive