Hacking What could lead to us A9LH 2.0?

[Billy Acuña]

I know that is for future compatibility and now we have more space due firm0 8.x.
But... What is the deal with 2.0?
Could this lead us to ShadowNAND?
I did read from @Shadowhand that he has been dealing with stage2 by completly rewriting SaltFW as native CFW into the NAND.

 

[Exavold]

Hum ... A9LH 2.0 ..? Wot.

 

[Touko White]

@Margen67 probably made it as a rumour or something lol

 

[Billy Acuña]

Hum ... A9LH 2.0 ..? Wot.

https://github.com/AuroraWright/SafeA9LHInstaller/releases

@Margen67 probably made it as a rumour or something lol

About what?

 

[Touko White]

About what?

I'm just posting that as a joke... I don't take many things seriously lol.

 

[Billy Acuña]

I'm just posting that as a joke... I don't take many things seriously lol.

But what is Marget's rumor exactly?
About extra space on firm0, future compatibility or ShadowNAND?

 

[Exavold]

https://github.com/AuroraWright/SafeA9LHInstaller/releases

Sorry if i'm offtopic but ... I have A9LH "1.0" right now , is it useful to update to "2.0" ?

 

[astronautlevel]

Only for future compatibility, as it gives more space for payloads.

 

[Billy Acuña]

Sorry if i'm offtopic but ... I have A9LH "1.0" right now , is it useful to update to "2.0" ?

Not ATM, I recommend you to stay on 1.0 due it lost a lot compatibility with older payloads, besides that there is no a deal with 2.0

 

[astronautlevel]

Not ATM, I recommend you to stay on 1.0 due it lost a lot compatibility with older payloads, besides that there is no a deal with 2.0

All payloads are fully compatible with a9lh 2.0 as of now.

 

[zoogie]

Sorry if i'm offtopic but ... I have A9LH "1.0" right now , is it useful to update to "2.0" ?

It's of no current use to the end user. It's best to wait until it becomes necessary for compatibility reasons.

 

[Billy Acuña]

All payloads are fully compatible with a9lh 2.0 as of now.

Sure, It works with d0k3's payload now, but it lose compatibility with, GW (?), I'm not a fan of GW but there are users that own a GW and gonna join to the master race's board. The true is that there is no a big deal to upgrade to 2.0 (yet...)

 

[aos10]

All payloads are fully compatible with a9lh 2.0 as of now.

not GW payload AFAIK.

 

[astronautlevel]

Sure, It works with d0k3's payload now, but it lose compatibility with, GW (?), I'm not a fan of GW but there are users that own a GW and gonna join to the master race's board. The true is that there is no a big deal to upgrade to 2.0 (yet...)

GW works as long as you use a bootmanager or screen-init iirc (but I may be wrong?)

 

[Billy Acuña]

GW works as long as you use a bootmanager or screen-init iirc (but I may be wrong?)

Well, it was with 1.0, many users reported that it doesn't work with 2.0, neither with BootCtr9.

 

[a9lh-1user]

When there is a new Windows version not ALL drivers are working at release day or ALL programs.
If you use that version from day one......you have some things that wont work.
It's always a good idea to wait some time to get on the new horse

 

[Billy Acuña]

When there is a new Windows version not ALL drivers are working at release day or ALL programs.
If you use that version from day one......you have some things that wont work.
It's always a good idea to wait some time to get on the new horse

Indeed

 

[RemixDeluxe]

This is my first time hearing about this today, is there really an arm9loader 2.0? Sounds trollish, like what would need to be improved upon the existing arm9loader.

 

[zoogie]

Just adding this:
<@plutoo> why is there a need for arm9loader 2.0 when v1 is already perfect?

From one of the co-authors of a9lh.

 

[a9lh-1user]

There is only one program i know that is nearly perfect!
Putty