Hardware WBFS having less problems?

dlf

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Messages
429
Trophies
0
XP
262
Country
United States
Quickie, any Wii games that work better or have less problems when on a WBFS partition than a FAT or NTFS? I'll give a list in a few hours. Have to go.
 

Kittymat

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
589
Trophies
0
Location
UK
Website
Visit site
XP
181
Country
Depends!

WBFS - works with all loaders, I have had issues with games failing to load (after adding more games to the hard drive) but generally stable, need to use a program to move files from hard drive to hard drive as the format is not recognised by computers.

FAT - only some loaders support it, large files are split (Fat only supports files up to 4GB)

NTFS - write function very poor, GX has issues with the files over 4GB

All however are stable at loading the games.

I use FAT32 as the hard drive can be defragmented, easy to swap files as the computer sees the drive, reliable read and write function
 

kyle007

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
387
Trophies
0
XP
97
Country
United States
guy above who says wbfs never had any problems, you've obviously never encountered a bunch of your games corrupting or you'd say otherwise
 

dlf

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Messages
429
Trophies
0
XP
262
Country
United States
Any specific game that have problems on FAT (or NTFS) that wouldn't happen on WBFS? I've converted most (or all) the games on my WBFS partition to FAT. But if some have problems on FAT, i'll keep some on a small(er) WBFS partition.

Oh and I mostly (if not always) use configurable, if that makes a difference.
 

kyle007

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
387
Trophies
0
XP
97
Country
United States
it should have exactly the same compatibility, and its good that you switched. There seems to be some people who absolutely refuse to believe that wbfs could have any problems whatsoever.
 

C.S.I.

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
411
Trophies
1
Location
Down under
Website
Visit site
XP
68
Country
I had a bad rip of a game within a few weeks of making my WBFS drive, it corrupted at least 1/2 of the 20+ games on the Drive.

Now only use FAT32 (+ Latest CFG Loader)
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    both of which work well in potplayer
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    amd is a bit cheaper though
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Cheaper and they are less stingy with the RAM not a big issue now but I can imagine in a yard or two things might be different
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Year not yard lol
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    the vram is one advantage when it comes to AI but ends up being slower even with that and really AI is the only use case that needs more than 12gb vram right now
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Interesting lol
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I think I watched a video where two games at 4K where eating just over 16GB of RAM and it's the one case where the 7900XT and XTX pulled ahead (minus RTX of course)
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    So my opinion is that they could age a bit better in the future, and maybe AMD will continue improving them via drivers like they tend to do. No guarantee there but they have done it in the past. Just a feeling I have.
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    cyberpunk at 4k without DLSS/fidelityfx *might* exceed 12gb
    +1
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    but that game barely runs at native 4k
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    I think it was some newer games and probably poorly optimized PS4 or PS5 ports
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    they definitely will age better but i feel dlss might outweigh that since it looks about as good as native resolution and much less demanding
    +1
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    When I played Cyberpunk on my old 2080 Ti it sucked lol
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    AMD could introduce something comparable to DLSS but nvidia's got a lot more experience with that
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    least amd 7xxx has tensor cores which the previous generations didn't so there is the potential for AI upscaling
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    They have FSR or whatever it's called and yeah it's still not great
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    so AMD seem to finally be starting to take AI seriously
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Oh yeah those new 8000 CPUs have AI cores built in that's interesting
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Maybe they plan on offloading to the CPU?
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Would be kinda cool to have the CPU and GPU working in random more
  • Psionic Roshambo @ Psionic Roshambo:
    Tandem even
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    i think i heard of that, it's a good idea, shouldn't need a dedicated GPU just to run a LLM or video upscaling
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    even the nvidia shield tv has AI video upscaling
  • The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye:
    LLMs can be run on cpu anyway but it's quite slow
    The Real Jdbye @ The Real Jdbye: LLMs can be run on cpu anyway but it's quite slow