UN: Disconnecting File-Sharers Breaches Human Rights

Discussion in 'User Submitted News' started by Terminator02, Jun 3, 2011.

  1. Terminator02
    OP

    Member Terminator02 ヽ( 。 ヮ゚)ノ

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    4,517
    Location:
    Somewhere near monkat
    Country:
    United States
    [​IMG]
    According to a UN report published in May and set to be adopted today, tough provisions in the UK’s Digital Economy Act and France’s ‘Hadopi’ legislation breach human rights.

    The Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression details concern for measures being put in place by various governments to punish online copyright infringement. In many cases those measures include the draconian step of denying citizens’ Internet access.

    “While blocking and filtering measures deny users access to specific content on the Internet, States have also taken measures to cut off access to the Internet entirely,” says the report.

    “The Special Rapporteur considers cutting off users from Internet access, regardless of
    the justification provided, including on the grounds of violating intellectual property rights law, to be disproportionate and thus a violation of article 19, paragraph 3, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.”

    The report highlights the legislation adopted by France and the UK, noting that the author of the report, Frank La Rue, is “alarmed” by proposals to severely punish Internet users if they violate intellectual property rights.

    “This also includes legislation based on the concept of ‘graduated response’, which imposes a series of penalties on copyright infringers that could lead to suspension of Internet service, such as the so-called “three-strikes-law” in France and the Digital Economy Act 2010 of the United Kingdom,” notes the report.

    In addition to calling on governments to maintain Internet access “during times of political unrest,” the report goes on to urge States to change copyright laws, not in favor of the music and movie industries as has been the recent trend, but in keeping with citizens’ rights.

    “In particular, the Special Rapporteur urges States to repeal or amend existing intellectual copyright laws which permit users to be disconnected from Internet access, and to refrain from adopting such laws,” the report adds.

    Whether or not the report will carry any influence with these so-far stubborn governments remains to be seen, but the Open Rights Group are keeping up the pressure on UK Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt. ORG have written to Hunt asking for his reaction to the Special Rapporteur’s report and his recommendation that the Digital Economy Act’s disconnection provisions should be repealed.[/p]
    [​IMG] Source (TorrentFreak)
     
  2. jamesaa

    Member jamesaa The Prince of Insufficient Light

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Messages:
    662
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Like sure the UK government would pay any attention to this, the two sides of the coalition seem much more content on arguing with each other than paying any attention to the country, never mind "little" things like the world wide web [​IMG]

    Things like the digital millennium act were rushed though parliament by the last government and conveniently ignored by the current government it seems.
     
  3. DSGamer64

    Member DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Messages:
    2,931
    Location:
    A cold cold place
    Country:
    Canada
    Those who file share got what they deserved by losing their connections, sorry kids.
     
  4. GreatZimkogway

    Member GreatZimkogway Touhou Fanatic

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,140
    Location:
    Imoriata
    Country:
    United States
    You're an idiot if you truly feel that way. Guess what. Download a free indie game. File sharing. Download music. File sharing. Download a picture. File sharing. Download a video. File. Sharing.
     
  5. Fear Zoa

    Member Fear Zoa This... This is the world we live in

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,437
    Location:
    Maryland
    Country:
    United States
    actually he/she file shared just by coming here....gbatemp is after all just a series of files on a server sent to the hosts upon request...

    But more or less i'm sure they meant the illegal type of file sharing [​IMG]
     
  6. Eckin

    Member Eckin GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    216
    Country:
    Brazil
    it's still quite fucked up.
     
  7. Wintrale

    Member Wintrale GBAtemp Advanced Fan

    Joined:
    May 19, 2009
    Messages:
    713
    Location:
    Kent, England
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Way to completely miss the point.

    If the law was as strict as you make it sound, merely using the internet would be grounds for banning people from it. Not only is this aimed purely at intellectual and copyrighted property, so downloading a "free indie game" wouldn't count, it's also only aimed at peer to peer services like torrents. Y'know, the number one way everyone uses to pirate stuff.
     
  8. DSGamer64

    Member DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2007
    Messages:
    2,931
    Location:
    A cold cold place
    Country:
    Canada
    We are talking about content that is paid for, not crap that is given away for free by the publishers of the content at their own consent. There is a HUGE difference and if you are too blind to see that, I hope they cut your internet for pirating stuff as well. Sorry, but buying something through a source that is a representative of the gaming, music or films industry for instance, is not file sharing, because it's a legal way to obtain copyrighted material. Downloading a program from another persons computer through torrents or any other P2P method is file sharing, and that is illegal. Think before you post next time.
     

Share This Page