Android user here.
There are three main aspects that I can see. Technical, price and, for lack of a better term, freedom/competition/abhorrence of apples business practices. Some concepts cross 2 or all of these aspects.
For me personally, the single biggest factor can be summed up in one word: Choice.
I'll just ramble a few things on each of the top of my head.
Technical:
- Choice! I can buy a low end phone if I just want a bright large(ish) screen for texting, web browsing etc, or buy a high end model if I want gaming and all the bells and whistles
- Bigger, arguably better screens, of varying sizes
- Customisability. Even without rooting the phone, you can install alternative 'launchers'. These replace almost all of the interface of the phone and many offer a LOT of options to customise things. I personally use ADW Launcher, but only use a fraction of its options.
- MicroSD slots for cheap storage expansion.
- Processors of higher clock speed/more cores/better GPUs. The standardisation (very few hardware variations) of apples products does lead to things being more optimised, and to be honest IOS is in many ways more efficient. Many of those ways are more about trade offs, eg do you allow background apps to run as they wish, or do you lock them down to very limited resources like IOS. Its not always clear cut better or worse, but rather trade-offs and some ppl will prefer the benefit of each end of them.
- Some people seem to love the proper stylus input on the note series. The styluses for normal capacitive touchscreens are rather crap.
Price (Pretty damn obvious, and for better or (likely) worse the biggest factor for many):
- Choice! The android ecosystem allows multiple manufacturers to make phones that can (performance permitting) all run the same applications. This creates competition and drives advancements forward as well as providing a range of options to consumers. iOS its apple and only apple.
- If the consumer is well informed (as much as possible, with some people it seems it's just not possible) they can save money by just buying a low end to mid range phone that does the basics they need. If you want higher end features there is often a choice of several devices that offer different higher end features, some of which will appeal to different people. If you want the best bleeding edge tech out there you can get that too if you care to pay for it. '
- I guess this is one aspect where I'd stress the importance of you as the salesman being as honest as you can with these things. Little can give android a bad name like ignorant consumers being sold low end products that cant meet their expectations, or oversold the highest end model when they just wanted a large(ish) screen to read txt messages. It's the consumers responsibility to be informed before they come to you, and the old addage about the salesman being the last person you should look to for advice on a product should be pretty well known, but I still dont agree with taking advantage of someone's ignorance. Unless they're a rude bastard, then F them
- Generally cheaper
- Apps tend towards being free with adds more so than iOS. This is largely due to piracy I guess, but its not like its all that hard to find a guide on jailbreaking iOS devices
- MicroSD slots make storage expansion a lot cheaper than buying a model with higher included storage
Freedom/Competition/abhorrence of apples business practices (a major factor for me):
- Choice! Competition gives consumers choice, the android ecosystem allows them to use their existing apps on another manufactures device. Say samsung stops including microSD card slots, another company (HTC etc) will happily fill that market and provide what the user wants. If apple does things you dont like with their hardware and you care to move to an alternative, there is none if you dont wish to re-purchase all your apps etc.
- Lack of the 'Walled Garden' (well, its somewhat there, but more of a curb designed to be walked overthan a wall).
- There is a single tick box in the android options that allows you to simply copy/download an application install file (.apk) to the device and install them. If google wishes to take down applications from the 'Play' store (stupid name) they can still be obtained/distributed by other means. On apple you rely on hackers finding an exploit in iOS to allow you to 'jailbreak' it. Apple patch these and new ones must be found. Add to this the moral objection to supporting a company that forces you to do this just to have some control over a device you purchased.
- Amazon even has their own 'Amazon Android App Store'. Apple sued them over the usage of 'app store' (and thankfully for sanity) lost. The audacity of apple in their lawsuits is staggering. They did not invent or name 'the application', nor its abbreviation. It would be like trying to own the name 'grocery store' or 'shoe store'.
- Custom ROMs. Dont like what google has included/done with android, or what your phones manufacturer has customised? Wipe the entire OS and choose from an alternative with the components/features you want. On many phones this is feature there by design, it does not require an exploit to allow you to have full access like this. Some phones are locked as manufactures are free to do so, but there is a market for such things and hence we have the freedom to choose devices that let you.
- Lawsuits from apple over broad concepts such as rounded corners on a touchscreen device, swiping your finger on the screen to unlock it, being minimal in asthetic etc. They seem to believe they can own entire broad concepts, even the entire touchscreen phone GUI paradigm. You cannot own concepts, only implementations and their arrogance is staggering.
It's sad but true that seemingly for some people, choice can actually be a bad thing rather than good. Just as you can make a better choice yourself than letting another make it, you can make worse. At least when made yourself you are working from your own requirements and desires, not that of a single company you are locked into without alternative (if you wish to keep existing purchases etc).
It does require some thought and consideration of the relative merits of alternatives, but the alternative of letting a single company control everything is far worse for long term trends of consumer freedom in their computing platforms.
I guess in short, its not just about technical comparisons. Apple makes fine hardware and software, but for as long as they maintain their strict control over the platform (walled garden) and suing over ridiculous things purely to stifle competition, they will not get money from me. Technically some things are better on one and other things better on the other.
Money doesn't just buy products, it supports ideas/concepts though what we all choose to buy. We all direct the market.
A lot of people dont seem to care at all about these things, which I feel will be to all of our detriment in the long run if these concepts dominate.
I think that's probably more than enough