Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'General Gaming Discussion' started by Valwin, Nov 25, 2011.
a review of the finish Minecraft game
And once again, we have another reviewer who's main points are bad graphics and NPCs being crappy (Even though they aren't finished), and thinks Minecraft is actually complete just because it's out of beta. Move along now, nothing to see here.
EDIT: Judging by their other reviews, they're either a joke review site, or complete jokes in general. They gave Portal 2 a 2.5/10, Amnesia: The Dark Descent a 1/10, Plants vs Zombies a 1.75/10, etc.
Dude they review the finish game if notch add stuff later good for him but as of now this is the final product
also the do reviews in a funny way but they are in deed reviews
If they gave Portal 2 and PvZ such low scores than they're clearly jokes. I've never heard of this site before and now I see why.
everyone haves different opinions just like that guy the give Zelda SS a 7/10
Valwin, your stupidity is showing again (Then again, when doesn't it show). There's a difference between having an opinion and being a complete moron.
7/10 and 2/10 aren't simply "differing opinions". Regardless of "opinion", if you call yourself a "reviewer" you have to acknowledge the positives of basic things like solid game design. I guess these guys lack this.
This site is clearly shit.
Hey guys we're cool and hip reviewers that don't follow the mainstream at all. See how we hate these popular games?
They're total shit because they're mainstream, guys, get with it.
EDIT: Nevermind. I looked at the site and it's literally a troll-review site.
Destroy that troll site now! I hope none of the people on there are serious.
I'm suddenly reminded of big news stations re-reporting stories from The Onion... XD
It's official: Video games now have their own Armond White.
'Thebestgamers' are a bunch of fags.
Minecraft is a 10/10 game. Nothing wrong with it, its suppose to have blocky graphics and npcs should hopefully be more advanced as Minecraft gets update in the future.
He also says 'I'm never touching this shit again.' What a fag.
I rate THE BEST GAMERS 1/10... wait i take that back... 1/100
You know they are really shit reviewers since IGN gave Minecraft a 9.0.
lest open our mind and get rid of your fanboy side and look at the video and think do the stuff they really say happen?
Is not the AI in minecraft dumb ? is not the combat broken ? is not the look of the game ugly ? is not the final world a joke ? are not the NPC useless ? take note we are talking about the full retail game for xbox360/PC/Ios
Apples and oranges?
Minecraft isn't an RPG.
I'm sure there are plenty of reasons to disagree with this review, but when you use an IGN score to validate your opinion, it doesn't really help your argument.
Also, "stuff will presumably be updated so it can't be criticized now" isn't really a valid argument either; you could hypothetically defend any game with the argument of "It will be patched" then.
by your logic them no game can be criticized because they keep getting patches ? take note that minecon was to release the full game the retail game
I don't seem the combat is broken, but I think Minecraft should only be for PC for full gaming experience. Lets see what they can do with the iOS and Xbox version.
Also texture packs can fix the 'ugly' game if you don't like the default look of it.
Anyway, he just released the full version due to Minecon. So I think he rushed it so much, so there is still time for more updates and fixes.
is not the game hardcore?
Anyway,another thing I see wrong with the review is they are grading it like it was meant to be a full console game experience.