Texas Supreme Court Allows for Arrest of Democrats Legislators

[Dakitten]

There is no shortage of both sides engaging voter intimidation, people don't need poll access to engage in voter intimidation. They just have to look at a news story you liked on Social media. If Facebook knows your preference to feed you an ad, so does everyone else.

I know the internet is your whole life and all, but some people (and likely cowards like yourself) don't actually care for harassment at their job sites and polling places. Seeing as the right has a bad habit of being savage idiotic barbarians regarding this sort of thing (just look at the nightmare of Tennessee's mask mandates hearing) and unique blindness to reality, this could easily develop into targeted harassment campaigns without a shred of remorse, empathy, or self reflection... oh, hey Jimbo!

 

[Foxi4]

I know the internet is your whole life and all, but some people (and likely cowards like yourself) don't actually care for harassment at their job sites and polling places. Seeing as the right has a bad habit of being savage idiotic barbarians regarding this sort of thing (just look at the nightmare of Tennessee's mask mandates hearing) and unique blindness to reality, this could easily develop into targeted harassment campaigns without a shred of remorse, empathy, or self reflection... oh, hey Jimbo!

Wait a minute now - I was led to believe that mail-in voting was secure and that one has to show proof of identity when requesting a mail-in ballot. What are we upset about - poll watchers having better insight into the procedure (and no means of affecting it, given the fact that they can't handle ballots, they're observers) or the requirement of documentation that proves citizenship, such as Social Security number (and an incomplete number at that) or the state's driver's license? Can you be more specific in regards to how this is an invasion of privacy? The state already has all of that data regardless - it's the state that issued both.