They'd all go the way of that 'ping long' or whatever it's name was. #POOF

 

Not really, the whole reason I use sxos rather than rei or raj is because I'm lazy and the others just smack of effort. So ya they should implement one.

 

1.7 gives the black screen also. Here’s to 1.8 hopefully fixing that issue. (On 6.0 currently).

 

But according to GaryOPA (dipshit) we were going to need EmuNAND and special NSPs that include data that actual eShop installs don't contain?

What happened Gary? You learn your lesson now?

 

Ya that's why Linux has taken over the desktop market. Not...

 

I can confirm 1.7 SX OS works with 6.0.0 fat32 package2 but fails with exfat package2. I guess they forgot about this?

Anyway, probably will see this fixed in the next release.

 

Alot of people like to cry about TX holy man for some of you who claim hate tx as much as you make it seem you're fast to hop on anything tx. If I hated something as you guys make it seem I'd ignore it all together.

You open source shit and then someone comes along and uses it for a profit you can't even cry about it, it's open source. Sounds like the people developer wise that are upset or more upset by the fact they didn't close source and profit.

I said, now I'll sit and wait till you all flame and cry. At the end of the day you slap no ass.

 

So do SX users only use SX for the XCI loader? or am i missing something.

 

started with xci, but now it can also do everything else without needing to know how to set anything up or finding the right files to download like i had to do when i had hekate+sigpatches+amosphere and devmenu and so on...it's just idiot proof.

 

What's funny is that I've realized that 100% of the people defending TX and SXOS also realized they paid $25 - $50 for a worse version of a free, open source project, and are now desperately trying to combat the buyers remorse from it.