Hacking Discussion SX EmuNAND is not real EmuNAND.

Joom

 ❤❤❤
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
6,067
Trophies
1
Location
US
Website
mogbox.net
XP
6,077
Country
United States
You can partition an SD card on a computer. Imagine the outrage if simply a partitioned SD card banned people. True, it's probably not common for the end user to do, but it's still something someone without any intent to hack or bypass security could do.
Right, except an EmuNAND is very specific and easy to detect. It doesn't use a standard filesystem, and is a big, sore thumb on a partition table. It doesn't look like a benign partition. There's already long posts from the 3DS scene as to how Nintendo could easily mitigate it.
 
Last edited by Joom,

Flying Scotsman

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
350
Trophies
0
XP
1,333
Country
United States
That's not an analysis, that's a screenshot not detailing shit.

Right because it's still not early days of release. That is what is available at time of posting. Given a week - sure there'd be more info on it but a day?

How do you know? Again, nobody has taken a look at the actual telemetry. Whether or not this is collected hasn't been proven, because again, you all ride the coattails of spoon feeders. Grab a PCAP for fuck's sake. Show us this will actually happen.

Oh I have before (albeit accidentally) when I was dicking about with the Switch but this was back on 4.1 and yes, it was sent twice when I loaded up the eShop (or so Wireshark mentioned - something definitely was sent) but I didn't pay much attention to it as at the time - I wasn't actually looking for Telemetry info (it just appeared).

I don't own a Switch, so therefore, no, I can't. And what you're proving to me is that you'd believe that the sky is green if somebody told you it was.

Then why not cut the attitude and discuss with those who can do an analysis? Going by your attitude, you seem frustrated that no inroads are being made - so why not contact someone who can get you a network traffic dump or decompiled payload and check it for yourself? No Switch required in that situation and you'd be helping the scene.
 
Last edited by Flying Scotsman,
  • Like
Reactions: tiliarou

froggestspirit

Aspiring Game Dev
Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Messages
1,281
Trophies
1
XP
1,561
Country
United States
Right, except an EmuNAND is very specific and easy to detect. It doesn't use a standard filesystem, and is a big, sore thumb on a partition table. It doesn't look like a benign partition.
While you do have a point there, a computer can be used to alter an SD partition in any way. The red flag is mostly from the fact that the NAND partition is modified, because that should not happen in a normal case. Generally with proper SD redirection, the system will not be able to tell the difference between the Emunand partition and the real nand (at the time of using, only being able to access the active nand). When this is cloned, then it is indistinguishable to nintendo. That being said, I still belive myself that the SD emunand isn't completely foolproof, but still safer than an "unmodifiable" nand being resized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tiliarou

Joom

 ❤❤❤
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
6,067
Trophies
1
Location
US
Website
mogbox.net
XP
6,077
Country
United States
While you do have a point there, a computer can be used to alter an SD partition in any way. The red flag is mostly from the fact that the NAND partition is modified, because that should not happen in a normal case. Generally with proper SD redirection, the system will not be able to tell the difference between the Emunand partition and the real nand (at the time of using, only being able to access the active nand). When this is cloned, then it is indistinguishable to nintendo. That being said, I still belive myself that the SD emunand isn't completely foolproof, but still safer than an "unmodifiable" nand being resized.
All Nintendo would have to do is perform a sanitization check on the SD's partition table upon boot, and done. This can be done before the OS is ever loaded.
Right because it's still not early days of release. That is what is available at time of posting. Given a week - sure there'd be more info on it but a day?
Why would this take a week? Just create the EmuNAND and monitor what happens. It should literally take no less than an hour. I don't even know why I would be required to do this either when somebody with all the necessary materials before them could do it quicker.
 

Flying Scotsman

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
350
Trophies
0
XP
1,333
Country
United States
What do you mean if you can't use OFW?

The running theory is Ninty can use telemetry to detect the weird NAND size discrepancies and take action - ala if you go into OFW, the "emunand" is detected and you're banned. He's more a less saying "what's the point in an emunand if we can't go into OFW to go Online because it could be detected, and the console banned."
 
  • Like
Reactions: tiliarou

Huntereb

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
3,234
Trophies
0
Website
lewd.pics
XP
2,446
Country
United States
It's most likely due to Nintendo's buggy ExFat driver.
ExFat is a file system format, it has nothing to do with the way people expect emunand to work.

No i dont need to know, I'm not going to use it, no need to as everything works with out it.
Why not? You paid good money for that feature, surely it was worth every penny! :creep:
 
  • Like
Reactions: tiliarou

Ashura66

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2016
Messages
1,768
Trophies
0
Age
37
Location
Under my bed
XP
1,684
Country
Portugal
The running theory is Ninty can use telemetry to detect the weird NAND size discrepancies and take action - ala if you go into OFW, the "emunand" is detected and you're banned. He's more a less saying "what's the point in an emunand if we can't go into OFW to go Online because it could be detected, and the console banned."

Oh right right, gotcha. Yeah no benefit whatsoever
 

Joom

 ❤❤❤
Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
6,067
Trophies
1
Location
US
Website
mogbox.net
XP
6,077
Country
United States
Oh right right, gotcha. Yeah no benefit whatsoever
You're missing the keyword "theory" here. Whether or not this particular modification to the partition will set anything off has yet to be determined because nobody will put forth the effort to actually find out.
 

Flying Scotsman

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
350
Trophies
0
XP
1,333
Country
United States
It should literally take no less than an hour. I don't even know why I would be required to do this either when somebody with all the necessary materials before them could do it quicker.

I mentioned that because you said:

You all sit around shoveling down garbage from Discord and other cesspools teeming with kids that know nothing, and you never do your own research because you got some other retard spoon feeding you said garbage.

It just so happens, those who will actually do the research (and report on it to varying degrees) are in the:-

Discord and other cesspools teeming with kids that know nothing

So logically, the only way to actually avoid "Discord [sweeping statement] and other cesspools" - is to do it yourself.

I do agree with the SD sanitisation though. It's a pretty straightforward thing to do, but whether Big N actually goes down that route - who knows. They may come up with some other hair brained way which doesn't properly work in Nintendo's usual style.
 
Last edited by Flying Scotsman,

AlexTCGPro

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
50
Trophies
0
Age
29
Location
Montevideo, Uruguay
XP
212
Country
Uruguay
Correct me if I'm wrong, and I'm probably am, but the release notes state that this 'emuNAND' is invisible to OFW and the telemetry in Nintendo's side just checks for total nand size meaning it will ignore partitions and still show 32GB to Nintendo, if those things are correct what is exactly the danger here? Can Nintendo detect ir right now? If the danger is that "Nintendo will release a new firmware update to detect it" then TX will as well to patch that
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceJump

bodefuceta

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2018
Messages
436
Trophies
0
XP
1,266
Country
Brazil
You're missing the keyword "theory" here. Whether or not this particular modification to the partition will set anything off has yet to be determined because nobody will put forth the effort to actually find out.
No, it's you who missed the keyword "if" in my post.
 

Kubas_inko

"Something funny goes here."
Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
6,324
Trophies
1
Age
24
Location
I gues on earth.
XP
5,180
Country
Czech Republic
Correct me if I'm wrong, and I'm probably am, but the release notes state that this 'emuNAND' is invisible to OFW and the telemetry in Nintendo's side just checks for total nand size meaning it will ignore partitions and still show 32GB to Nintendo, if those things are correct what is exactly the danger here? Can Nintendo detect ir right now? If the danger is that "Nintendo will release a new firmware update to detect it" then TX will as well to patch that
They can be invisible to each other, but you are losing 16Gb of space, which can be reported by the telemetry.

-snip-
 
Last edited by Quantumcat, , Reason: Removed reply to deleted post

AlexTCGPro

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
50
Trophies
0
Age
29
Location
Montevideo, Uruguay
XP
212
Country
Uruguay
They can be invisible to each other, but you are losing 16Gb of space, which is reported by the telemetry.
Yes, indeed, but Nintendo can't know what that is, or can they? Could be 16gbs of pictures, of savedata, just regular memory corruption, many things, has someone actually been banned yet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceJump

SkittleDash

Head Nurse
Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2015
Messages
1,863
Trophies
2
Age
28
Location
Storm Border
XP
1,072
Country
Japan
So TX fucked up again? I'm just going to sit here and just shake my head in disappointment. And here I thought they did something great. Turned out they did something not so great. At this point, it's $22 - $30 (Licence only) just to get that sexy ban.

source.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darth Meteos

Sgt. Lulz

Beef up
Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
404
Trophies
0
XP
1,207
Country
United Kingdom
I don't understand why they brought up that dedicating 32GB on an SD card to EmuNAND is wasteful, then proceeded to showcase that the Switch filesystem can be resized and repartitioned in the same breath.
If you're incredibly desperate for storage space, you could fit the entire filesystem into 4GB by shrinking USER to 1.38GB:
PRODINFO/F, BCPKG*, BOOT0/1, SAFE: 122MB (Give or take one)
SYSTEM: 2.5GB
USER: The rest of the unpartitioned space

Hell, you could go as low as a destitute 2GB by shrinking SYSTEM to 902MB, given that the majority of the partition is empty space.
You can get high quality 8GB or 16GB microSD cards for less than $10 at just about any outlet or retailer, and they're a must-have in console homebrew and hacking.

All Nintendo would have to do is perform a sanitization check on the SD's partition table upon boot, and done. This can be done before the OS is ever loaded.

Why would this take a week? Just create the EmuNAND and monitor what happens. It should literally take no less than an hour. I don't even know why I would be required to do this either when somebody with all the necessary materials before them could do it quicker.
SwitchBrew has up-to-date documentation on the data fields erpt sends to Nintendo:
https://switchbrew.org/wiki/Error_Report_services#Fields
Additionally, they're legally not allowed to ban users based on what their SD card looks like. It's not bound to the Terms of Service, and their contents by themselves have no effect on the software's operation. They would've started banning people for having boot.3dsx, payload.bin, devMenu.cia or a conspicuous raw partition in their SD card a long time ago if they could.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    K3Nv2 @ K3Nv2: Well start walking towards them +1