I recently got the retail release of Azure Striker Gunvolt Striker Pack for Nintendo switch. In case if anyone is curious, this is a compilation 2-in-1 game that features the first 2 games in the series with some additional features exclusive to nintendo switch that wasn't done on 3DS release.
Anyway I intend to review this game (and every other game I own for nintendo switch if it hasn't already been done) but the problem I'm faced with is that most people tend to comment about the "Length" of text. In this case, for example, I have published Puyo Puyo tetris review CLICK HERE. In which I write the review covers all the plethora of content the game offers including all the game modes and each of their gameplay styles. (And to admit that I never really done such a game before which is a first and also difficult to date from when I started.)
What I was gonna do is just review the game, the intention was to explain both games as I feel is required to anyone not familiar with it before, But I have a idea for a different approach. Both games yet to been reviewed individually, so I was asking if you think I should review them each in their own review before the compilation game, in this case the actual compilation would be shorter cause is unnecessary to add the details of the two games (cause reviews for them are already available) Or just review the compilation game as I intended?
I'm asking people who is either interested in this game's review or reading reviews in general. If you don't care honestly, there is no need to comment about not caring, just don't comment. My original idea is to condense into one review but to avoid community backlash I wish to know what you are thinking.
Anyway I intend to review this game (and every other game I own for nintendo switch if it hasn't already been done) but the problem I'm faced with is that most people tend to comment about the "Length" of text. In this case, for example, I have published Puyo Puyo tetris review CLICK HERE. In which I write the review covers all the plethora of content the game offers including all the game modes and each of their gameplay styles. (And to admit that I never really done such a game before which is a first and also difficult to date from when I started.)
What I was gonna do is just review the game, the intention was to explain both games as I feel is required to anyone not familiar with it before, But I have a idea for a different approach. Both games yet to been reviewed individually, so I was asking if you think I should review them each in their own review before the compilation game, in this case the actual compilation would be shorter cause is unnecessary to add the details of the two games (cause reviews for them are already available) Or just review the compilation game as I intended?
I'm asking people who is either interested in this game's review or reading reviews in general. If you don't care honestly, there is no need to comment about not caring, just don't comment. My original idea is to condense into one review but to avoid community backlash I wish to know what you are thinking.