chrisrlink said:well its useless to pirate games seeing tha BD's have very large disc capacities like 50GB+ so you may only be able to store 1-2 games on the ps3's HDD besides that torrenting would take forever and last time i checked games you own is legal to back up
Joe88 said:maybe because it wasnt a problem in the last 4 yearsPuregamer said:Since when have you ever heard of a ps3 developer complaining about piracy causing sale losses.
Well, it might be with these PS3 hacks.Puregamer said:Joe88 said:maybe because it wasnt a problem in the last 4 yearsPuregamer said:Since when have you ever heard of a ps3 developer complaining about piracy causing sale losses.
and it is now?
mkoo said:DMCA is a ridiculous law.
Oh and I would consider buying a PS3 if I could pirate games.
Try reading what I said again, please. I never mentioned jailbreaking, I mentioned bypassing DRM (which was the issue with the DMCA).OrGoN3 said:I was under the impression that either the dongle contained proprietary code, or because an actual Sony jigstick was simply taken and reverse-engineered.Nope.
QUOTE(OrGoN3 @ Sep 4 2010, 04:30 AM) To everyone saying that jailbreaking is now legal under DMCA and all that good fun, GTFO. Seriously. Jailbreaking, referring to an iPhone, simply means to allow you to switch to any carrier and install non-Apple applications. We already have non-Sony games, and there are no carriers for consoles. Just because this has the word "jailbreak" in the name, doesn't mean it is exactly the same thing.
Those must be some of the most stupidest posts I have ever read. You really think Sony, Nintendo or MS primary concern is selling the console? Most of them are sold on razor thin margins, if not at a loss (original Xbox). It's all about the games. That is where the profit lies. So, in their POV, they really don't give a sh*t about those who want to hack the console. Why would they?Puregamer said:mkoo said:DMCA is a ridiculous law.
Oh and I would consider buying a PS3 if I could pirate games.
Exactly, they're just losing sales because of this.
Sony's stupid. Since when have you ever heard of a ps3 developer complaining about piracy causing sale losses.
People buy consoles because they're hackable and you can pirate.
papavader said:Those must be some of the most stupidest posts I have ever read. You really think Sony, Nintendo or MS primary concern is selling the console? Most of them are sold on razor thin margins, if not at a loss (original Xbox). It's all about the games. That is where the profit lies. So, in their POV, they really don't give a sh*t about those who want to hack the console. Why would they?Puregamer said:mkoo said:DMCA is a ridiculous law.
Oh and I would consider buying a PS3 if I could pirate games.
Exactly, they're just losing sales because of this.
Sony's stupid. Since when have you ever heard of a ps3 developer complaining about piracy causing sale losses.
People buy consoles because they're hackable and you can pirate.They are within their rights to protect themselves. Getting angry about that is the pinnacle of stupidity.
That said, they brought it on themselves by removing "Other OS" as the hack is now in the wild and was apparently made possible with some of Geohot's findings.
The dongle has nothing stolen from Sony. The ONLY thing that has copyright code would be the HD loader program which ISN'T included with the dongle. It needs to be downloaded from the website if what I've read is correct. Sony would have a better chance with a lawsuit against the psjailbreak website for distroing the backup manager than against the people who distro the dongle itself. ALSO the PS3 was originally released allowing homebrew through the use of Linux in the otherOS install option that they removed in one of the firmware updates.OrGoN3 said:I was under the impression that either the dongle contained proprietary code, or because an actual Sony jigstick was simply taken and reverse-engineered.
As it was stated before but I'll state it again. While they apprently used a offical Sony Jigstick, it was only used to see how it works. The exploit itself is completely homebrew and no copyright code was used.
Not allowing homebrew on a system is a staple in the industry. But that's not even the issue here. The issue is that the jigstick is in some form stolen from Sony. So they sue. Common sense.OrGoN3 said:To everyone saying that jailbreaking is now legal under DMCA and all that good fun, GTFO. Seriously. Jailbreaking, referring to an iPhone, simply means to allow you to switch to any carrier and install non-Apple applications. We already have non-Sony games, and there are no carriers for consoles. Just because this has the word "jailbreak" in the name, doesn't mean it is exactly the same thing.
Jailbreaking an iPhone does not allow allow different carriers. That's unlocking which isn't protected by the Jailbreaking ruling to my knowledge. While we have non-Sony games, EVERY game released has to be approved by Sony before they can be released (the same applies for those Apple apps, they're not all made by Apple but all have to licensed by Apple to be released). That is why all games have traditionally showed the the Sony logo when it is first loaded. In order to release a game on the PS3 (or any other console for that matter) you have to go through Sony approval and pay a licensing fee.
Half true. While the dev mode is most likely used for repairing PS3s, it DOES free the system. Dev mode was originally designed for game developers in mind. It allows non signed code to run as well as has a Blu-ray emulation mode so the game devs don't have to constantly reburn a game they're producing to test out any changes they've made. While games are in dev, they aren't signed and therefore cannot run in a normal PS3. The devs just have special PS3s that are permanently in dev mode.OrGoN3 said:This is simply Sony's proprietary way of enabling/loading developer "mode" on the system, to allow for diagnostics, etc. This is used by Sony to fix PS3s. This is no way frees the device.
QUOTE(OrGoN3 @ Sep 4 2010, 01:30 AM)