That video is comparing EmuNAND boot speed for a9lh vs menuhax.
Someone need to make a video comparing a9lh SysNAND boot speed vs EmuNAND (using the same NAND as base)
That was the intent of my post to @
Cherry Pie. He was advocating that sysNAND is faster so I asked him for a video similar to the menuhax vs A9LH to showcase this pro.
Saving 1.84 GB of space, and 2 seconds in booting to sysNAND seems almost negligible to me as an emuNAND user contemplating moving to updated sysNAND. Difference between A9LH and menuhax is like night and day.
They both work, but unless you have a tiny SD card (in which case you should save bottles and cans to to get money to buy a bigger one) the speed boost and couple GB of data seems kinda petty reasons to change. Yeah I know the advocates will say all my GBA VC and cia in one location ( a more valid reason not stated by
@Cherry Pie) but booting into sysNAND to play GBA is not a monumental task in itself.
I use
@FIX94 A9LH and arm9select to load ReiNand as default for 3DS games from emuNAND. Hold R launches AuReiNAND sysNAND for my GBA fix, and I got the L button poised to load Gateway for cheat purposes when they finally release their A9LH support. Works great for me and maybe some others but not all. Just 2 cents from a guy who has used emuNAND for 3+ years since Gateway dropped it on the scene for us to play around with. Updated sysNAND is more for power users who like to tinker and know what they are doing, emuNAND is for people who want the false sense of security that our sysNAND remains largely untouched (warm fuzzy). I'll get off my soapbox and retreat to my corner to get my dunce cap now. Thanks for listening.
Edit: Sorry this post is way off topic, I just got carried away when
@Cherry Pie tossed updated sysNAND into the fray. My apologies.